WEBVTT

00:00:11.092 --> 00:00:15.972
<v Chris>Hello, friends, and welcome back to your weekly Linux talk show. My name is Chris.

00:00:16.112 --> 00:00:16.812
<v Wes>My name is Wes.

00:00:16.992 --> 00:00:17.692
<v Brent>And my name is Brent.

00:00:18.312 --> 00:00:24.072
<v Chris>Hello, gentlemen, and joining us as referee this week, it's our friendly editor, Drew. Hello, Drew.

00:00:24.372 --> 00:00:25.932
<v Drew>Welcome to the Thunderdome.

00:00:26.952 --> 00:00:27.712
<v Wes>Uh-oh.

00:00:27.972 --> 00:00:30.892
<v Chris>That's a little indication of how it's going to go today. Today,

00:00:30.892 --> 00:00:35.092
<v Chris>we are owning up to our 2025 predictions. We'll see how we did.

00:00:35.292 --> 00:00:39.032
<v Chris>And then we're going to make bold and powerful 2026 predictions.

00:00:39.432 --> 00:00:42.492
<v Chris>So don't miss that. Then we're going to round out the show with some really

00:00:42.492 --> 00:00:44.652
<v Chris>great booze, some pics, and a lot more.

00:00:44.872 --> 00:00:47.932
<v Chris>This is where I'd say hello, Mumble Room, but shout out to those of you that

00:00:47.932 --> 00:00:49.412
<v Chris>are up there in the quiet listening right now.

00:00:49.832 --> 00:00:51.872
<v Chris>Look at them. Look at them.

00:00:52.052 --> 00:00:53.572
<v Wes>Listening so quietly.

00:00:53.752 --> 00:00:55.932
<v Chris>So quietly. If only my kids could be that quiet.

00:00:55.932 --> 00:00:56.552
<v Brent>I don't hear them.

00:00:57.072 --> 00:00:59.972
<v Chris>I know. Because they're in there quiet listening. Hello to all of you that join

00:00:59.972 --> 00:01:03.972
<v Chris>us in that live Mumble Room. Going every single Sunday that we do this here show.

00:01:05.378 --> 00:01:08.878
<v Chris>And a big good morning to our friends at Defined Networking.

00:01:09.538 --> 00:01:13.998
<v Chris>Defined.net slash unplugged. Go check out Managed Nebula.

00:01:14.358 --> 00:01:18.498
<v Chris>This is what you want to build on. It's a decentralized VPN that is built on

00:01:18.498 --> 00:01:21.598
<v Chris>top of the open source Nebula project that we already trust and love.

00:01:21.698 --> 00:01:23.218
<v Chris>It's out there. It's fully open source.

00:01:23.938 --> 00:01:27.618
<v Chris>But here's the real difference with Nebula. There isn't a free tier that exists

00:01:27.618 --> 00:01:31.858
<v Chris>to funnel you into some sort of VC-funded SaaS roadmap that's being developed.

00:01:32.238 --> 00:01:35.618
<v Chris>Right? So when a networking tool reaches a certain venture scale,

00:01:35.738 --> 00:01:39.318
<v Chris>let's call it, the business eventually competes with the free product,

00:01:39.878 --> 00:01:42.858
<v Chris>especially if there's a free tier. We all have seen the way this goes.

00:01:43.798 --> 00:01:47.718
<v Chris>We've seen the way this goes. With Nebula, you own the network.

00:01:47.918 --> 00:01:52.098
<v Chris>You own identity, routing, and the control stays with you.

00:01:52.678 --> 00:01:57.578
<v Chris>Not a third-party control plane that you don't control. You control everything.

00:01:57.698 --> 00:02:01.358
<v Chris>And Nebula's decentralized design means that no single point of failure is going

00:02:01.358 --> 00:02:04.818
<v Chris>to impact you. And the optional self-hosted Lighthouse nodes means that you

00:02:04.818 --> 00:02:06.938
<v Chris>keep discovery in your hands.

00:02:07.558 --> 00:02:09.378
<v Chris>That's so sweet. It's how you

00:02:09.378 --> 00:02:12.978
<v Chris>want to build when you're building your home infra or your business infra.

00:02:13.518 --> 00:02:16.038
<v Chris>Nebula was originally built to connect Slack's global infrastructure.

00:02:16.038 --> 00:02:20.858
<v Chris>So it was designed from the beginning to scale and perform so it can work for

00:02:20.858 --> 00:02:23.478
<v Chris>your lab and it can work for your global corporation.

00:02:23.718 --> 00:02:28.578
<v Chris>Go get 100 hosts for free right now. Support the show. No credit card required. No lock-in.

00:02:28.798 --> 00:02:33.838
<v Chris>Go to defined.net slash unplugged. That's define.net slash unplugged.

00:02:34.218 --> 00:02:38.138
<v Chris>Go support the show and check out Managed Nebula.

00:02:38.838 --> 00:02:43.318
<v Chris>Now, gentlemen, we have a little bit of housekeeping to get into before we start with predictions.

00:02:45.658 --> 00:02:49.598
<v Chris>It's that time of year again. If you can believe it, the call for papers for

00:02:49.598 --> 00:02:53.438
<v Chris>LinuxFest Northwest 2026 ends in just a couple of days.

00:02:54.178 --> 00:02:55.898
<v Chris>December 31st, 2025.

00:02:56.838 --> 00:02:58.218
<v Chris>You going to get a talk in, Wes?

00:02:58.418 --> 00:03:00.398
<v Wes>Oh, boy. Well, I better go quick.

00:03:01.078 --> 00:03:04.978
<v Brent>I swear, like, years are getting shorter or something. It feels like we just did this.

00:03:05.078 --> 00:03:09.358
<v Chris>I know, right? I know. It's crazy. LinuxFest Northwest is back in April,

00:03:09.518 --> 00:03:14.578
<v Chris>the 24th to the 26th, 2026 at Bellingham Technical College. and I believe that

00:03:14.578 --> 00:03:17.018
<v Chris>big area is going to be back available to us again.

00:03:17.258 --> 00:03:17.778
<v Wes>Oh, nice.

00:03:18.618 --> 00:03:19.058
<v Chris>Yeah.

00:03:19.758 --> 00:03:21.198
<v Wes>It was a great time last year.

00:03:21.358 --> 00:03:25.398
<v Chris>It was nice. If you can believe it, that's only 117 days away,

00:03:25.938 --> 00:03:28.498
<v Chris>which means if you include holidays in this, except for U.S.

00:03:28.578 --> 00:03:32.958
<v Chris>federal holidays, that's 82 business days away, which makes it 16 Linux unplugs

00:03:32.958 --> 00:03:36.998
<v Chris>away, which means Brent needs to be on the road by episode 660.

00:03:38.338 --> 00:03:41.738
<v Brent>I really appreciate how you give me the heads up because I need it.

00:03:41.738 --> 00:03:45.558
<v Wes>Oh, boost in your bet by which episode he actually hits the road.

00:03:45.818 --> 00:03:47.138
<v Brent>And which route should I take?

00:03:47.458 --> 00:03:51.498
<v Chris>You better. Also, if you want to catch up on how the van, or a.k.a.

00:03:51.538 --> 00:03:56.698
<v Chris>the bang bus, is doing, Brent stopped by the launch episode 46 at weeklylaunch.rocks.

00:03:57.278 --> 00:04:03.278
<v Chris>Nature chose violence, and Brent tells quite the tale, which I appreciated.

00:04:03.538 --> 00:04:07.398
<v Chris>Also, I talk a little bit about the flooding that hit the Pacific Northwest.

00:04:08.018 --> 00:04:09.318
<v Wes>You've been a local weatherman.

00:04:09.598 --> 00:04:13.418
<v Chris>It was quite the thing, Wes. I became an island is what happened.

00:04:13.538 --> 00:04:14.718
<v Chris>I became an island for real.

00:04:15.598 --> 00:04:19.158
<v Chris>So that is weeklylaunch.rocks and episode 46 for that.

00:04:19.278 --> 00:04:25.118
<v Chris>And we'll have a link to the LinuxFest Northwest 2026 call for speakers if that interests you.

00:04:27.506 --> 00:04:33.446
<v Chris>All right, gentlemen, it is time for predictions past. Before we get into how 2026 is going to go.

00:04:33.746 --> 00:04:35.146
<v Wes>You're making us make good on it.

00:04:35.366 --> 00:04:37.466
<v Chris>We got to see how we did for 2025.

00:04:38.286 --> 00:04:41.926
<v Brent>Did anyone else completely forget their predictions from last year?

00:04:42.406 --> 00:04:42.886
<v Chris>Yes.

00:04:43.186 --> 00:04:48.206
<v Brent>I only remembered one of mine and the others. I feel like it wasn't even me

00:04:48.206 --> 00:04:50.706
<v Brent>who wrote those or committed to those. But there's evidence, right, somewhere?

00:04:50.946 --> 00:04:55.006
<v Chris>There is evidence. In fact, we have audio on tape.

00:04:55.186 --> 00:04:59.086
<v Chris>So let's start with Brent's first prediction. For 2025.

00:04:59.786 --> 00:05:05.726
<v Clips>I believe in 2025, we will see a commercially available machine be released

00:05:05.726 --> 00:05:09.486
<v Clips>using RISC-V from major vendors.

00:05:12.117 --> 00:05:17.917
<v Brent>That's not my best prediction sentence, got to say. Machine is not very good.

00:05:18.337 --> 00:05:19.777
<v Brent>Yeah, Drew, you should have caught me on that.

00:05:20.737 --> 00:05:24.597
<v Drew>Well, I wasn't judging last year, so that's not on me.

00:05:24.977 --> 00:05:27.977
<v Brent>Well, we needed you. I'm nervous about this one.

00:05:28.137 --> 00:05:32.197
<v Chris>For those that are new to the show, Drew is here to play referee to make sure

00:05:32.197 --> 00:05:36.517
<v Chris>that we have good, solid predictions that should be measurable by the next year.

00:05:36.877 --> 00:05:40.357
<v Chris>And so this is a tricky one, ref. I think we might have to start with right away.

00:05:41.637 --> 00:05:46.157
<v Chris>I think you could call this technically true in the sense that Meta,

00:05:46.317 --> 00:05:52.457
<v Chris>in March of 2025, started deploying their custom AI and training inference chips

00:05:52.457 --> 00:05:54.417
<v Chris>built around RISC-V in their data center.

00:05:54.877 --> 00:06:02.457
<v Chris>And in late 2025, the Coral MPU officially released the Coral MPU from Google that is RISC-V based.

00:06:02.457 --> 00:06:06.457
<v Chris>I guess you could kind of consider that. But there's a few other like large

00:06:06.457 --> 00:06:11.537
<v Chris>data center implementations of RISC-V this year that didn't exist in 2024.

00:06:12.237 --> 00:06:15.137
<v Chris>So I asked the AI bot, and I want to hear what you think about this, Drew.

00:06:15.137 --> 00:06:20.257
<v Chris>The AI bot says that the prediction correctly identified an inflection point

00:06:20.257 --> 00:06:26.017
<v Chris>as of late December 2025, RISC-V has reached an estimated 25% market penetration

00:06:26.017 --> 00:06:27.917
<v Chris>in the semiconductor industry,

00:06:28.317 --> 00:06:34.757
<v Chris>largely due to major vendors abandoning expensive ARM licenses in favor of custom RISC-V silicon.

00:06:35.097 --> 00:06:39.417
<v Chris>So when Brent said a commercially available machine using RISC-V from a major

00:06:39.417 --> 00:06:43.317
<v Chris>vendor will be released, what do you think, Ref? Did he get it right?

00:06:43.317 --> 00:06:46.017
<v Drew>So here's the tricky part, custom.

00:06:47.475 --> 00:06:52.775
<v Drew>All right. So these guys are making their own risk five boards.

00:06:52.955 --> 00:06:55.095
<v Drew>Is that correct? Or are they selling them?

00:06:55.995 --> 00:06:57.035
<v Brent>Mm hmm.

00:06:57.875 --> 00:07:02.415
<v Chris>I believe you do have them on a technicality there. I think they may be at least

00:07:02.415 --> 00:07:03.975
<v Chris>having them manufactured on their behalf.

00:07:04.275 --> 00:07:12.815
<v Drew>Yeah. So for it to be commercially available, it needs to be sold from one company to another.

00:07:13.155 --> 00:07:15.335
<v Drew>That can't be an in-house product.

00:07:16.015 --> 00:07:19.635
<v Chris>Mm hmm. I think that's fair. It's not commercially available.

00:07:19.755 --> 00:07:20.995
<v Chris>It's privately available.

00:07:21.215 --> 00:07:26.795
<v Drew>So yeah, if you can tell me a company that is commercially producing these and

00:07:26.795 --> 00:07:30.775
<v Drew>selling them, it's a win. If you can't, it's a loss.

00:07:31.035 --> 00:07:36.015
<v Brent>I think this was a failure in describing my prediction, I will say.

00:07:36.175 --> 00:07:45.235
<v Brent>So I remember the sort of intention for this prediction was specifically around desktop computers.

00:07:45.235 --> 00:07:50.595
<v Brent>So when I use the word machine in saying a commercially available machine,

00:07:50.595 --> 00:07:58.615
<v Brent>I should have said a commercially available like desktop or tablet or single. Exactly.

00:07:58.855 --> 00:08:02.835
<v Brent>So I was thinking more available for the consumer market.

00:08:03.395 --> 00:08:04.155
<v Chris>Okay.

00:08:04.655 --> 00:08:11.195
<v Brent>So if we take it from that perspective, I do recall that the framework did make

00:08:11.195 --> 00:08:13.015
<v Brent>available a RISC-V board.

00:08:14.258 --> 00:08:18.238
<v Brent>but I think I'm going to fail myself on that from a technicality unless anyone

00:08:18.238 --> 00:08:23.258
<v Brent>else can help me win this one because that was announced February 4th,

00:08:23.338 --> 00:08:27.338
<v Brent>and our episode was February 5th, so I feel like it's not fair to make a prediction

00:08:27.338 --> 00:08:28.458
<v Brent>that happened the day before.

00:08:30.058 --> 00:08:31.678
<v Chris>Oh, you didn't have to out yourself.

00:08:32.458 --> 00:08:34.018
<v Brent>I'm the honest one here.

00:08:35.798 --> 00:08:37.698
<v Drew>So it was announced.

00:08:37.778 --> 00:08:40.978
<v Chris>Yeah, the day before the episode. He didn't know about it, but it was technically

00:08:40.978 --> 00:08:43.538
<v Chris>public information the day before the episode.

00:08:46.658 --> 00:08:50.018
<v Brent>At least for my limited research, which is, yeah, that's not fair.

00:08:50.955 --> 00:08:53.415
<v Drew>You know, I'd say, are we doing half points?

00:08:54.095 --> 00:08:54.475
<v Brent>Wow.

00:08:54.855 --> 00:08:58.175
<v Chris>I could get behind half points. If Wes doesn't object, I could get behind a

00:08:58.175 --> 00:09:01.255
<v Chris>half point. We could do that, like a .5.

00:09:01.475 --> 00:09:04.595
<v Wes>Okay, yeah. All right, we'll be generous this year. It is the holidays.

00:09:04.675 --> 00:09:05.295
<v Drew>It is the holidays.

00:09:05.515 --> 00:09:05.815
<v Brent>That was unbelievable.

00:09:06.155 --> 00:09:06.935
<v Drew>Half a point.

00:09:07.235 --> 00:09:09.715
<v Chris>And there was definitely an uptick in the deployment of RISC-V.

00:09:09.895 --> 00:09:10.195
<v Drew>Mm-hmm.

00:09:10.995 --> 00:09:15.975
<v Chris>Fair. Fair. Okay. All right. Well, Brantley, you win on a technicality. Congratulations.

00:09:16.235 --> 00:09:16.915
<v Wes>What are we doing?

00:09:17.255 --> 00:09:17.555
<v Brent>Wow.

00:09:17.855 --> 00:09:21.795
<v Chris>All right. I'm going to keep this. I'm going to keep track here. I'll keep track.

00:09:22.535 --> 00:09:26.095
<v Chris>All right. So, Brentley, you had a second prediction for us.

00:09:26.475 --> 00:09:31.035
<v Chris>You said in 2025, this was definitely going to happen.

00:09:31.295 --> 00:09:36.575
<v Clips>In 2025, the Ubuntu core desktop will be found as either a download on ubuntu.com

00:09:36.575 --> 00:09:39.795
<v Clips>slash download or as an Ubuntu flavor.

00:09:40.275 --> 00:09:44.735
<v Brent>I, this was like half prediction, half hope.

00:09:45.335 --> 00:09:51.175
<v Brent>I was really hoping this was going to happen for Ubuntu's future generally.

00:09:51.535 --> 00:09:54.475
<v Wes>I don't know if our wish casting generally works or does it?

00:09:54.655 --> 00:09:55.715
<v Chris>It does not seem to work.

00:09:55.855 --> 00:10:00.855
<v Brent>I know. That's where I trip up on my predictions is I just put in my own desires

00:10:00.855 --> 00:10:03.155
<v Brent>in there. And sometimes they happen and most of the time they don't.

00:10:03.595 --> 00:10:08.195
<v Chris>Here's the deal, ref. I looked it up. No, it is not downloadable on Ubuntu.com.

00:10:08.815 --> 00:10:12.235
<v Chris>The traditional Ubuntu desktop release is shipped as scheduled,

00:10:12.235 --> 00:10:16.575
<v Chris>but the ubuntu desktop that is the ubuntu core version and immutable snap only

00:10:16.575 --> 00:10:21.135
<v Chris>version of the os did not graduate to a standard download option and is still

00:10:21.135 --> 00:10:28.175
<v Chris>very much under development so i think that one's kind of a clear yeah loser yeah sorry brently no.

00:10:28.175 --> 00:10:30.295
<v Brent>It's fine i also have to add that,

00:10:31.397 --> 00:10:38.097
<v Brent>Given zero action last year, it felt like, on this, a micro prediction is that

00:10:38.097 --> 00:10:39.977
<v Brent>this year doesn't feel so good for this either.

00:10:40.097 --> 00:10:40.357
<v Chris>Does it?

00:10:44.117 --> 00:10:49.197
<v Chris>Okay, so zero points for that one. But let's see what your next one was,

00:10:49.217 --> 00:10:53.657
<v Chris>because maybe you had a vision for this next one. I was very impressed.

00:10:53.657 --> 00:11:02.337
<v Clips>In 2025, we will see a tech YouTuber of over a million subscribers do a iSwitched-style

00:11:02.337 --> 00:11:07.417
<v Clips>video for Linux, using it as their main desktop OS for a period of time.

00:11:08.137 --> 00:11:11.897
<v Chris>Wow, did you nail that one. So, yeah.

00:11:12.097 --> 00:11:16.737
<v Chris>On April 26, 2025, PewDiePie, I installed Linux, and so should you.

00:11:17.257 --> 00:11:23.677
<v Chris>PewDiePie has 110 million subscribers, and as of this AM, the video has seen

00:11:23.677 --> 00:11:30.337
<v Chris>7.3 million views, and it's the third most popular Linux video on YouTube.

00:11:31.397 --> 00:11:35.837
<v Brent>Yeah. It took a couple months, but that was an early win.

00:11:36.217 --> 00:11:37.077
<v Drew>Very clear win.

00:11:37.717 --> 00:11:38.517
<v Chris>Wow, Brent.

00:11:38.517 --> 00:11:41.737
<v Wes>I mean, do we know that Brent and PewDiePie aren't friends, or there's some

00:11:41.737 --> 00:11:42.617
<v Wes>sort of back-channeling?

00:11:42.977 --> 00:11:48.797
<v Chris>Not only was there that, But then there was a kind of a secondary effect of

00:11:48.797 --> 00:11:51.437
<v Chris>many other YouTubers making Linux content as well.

00:11:52.437 --> 00:11:57.277
<v Brent>Lots of reaction videos based on it, right? It was a whole hoopla there for a couple of weeks.

00:11:57.297 --> 00:11:58.077
<v Chris>In a way, you were not bullish enough.

00:12:00.137 --> 00:12:01.897
<v Chris>Okay. Congratulations, sir.

00:12:04.748 --> 00:12:11.528
<v Chris>So that's 1.5 points for Mr. Brentley, I believe. So not bad, Brent, not bad.

00:12:11.788 --> 00:12:14.528
<v Brent>Of a possible three points, is that it? So 50%.

00:12:14.528 --> 00:12:14.668
<v Chris>Yep.

00:12:15.068 --> 00:12:15.308
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:12:15.768 --> 00:12:16.248
<v Brent>I'll take it.

00:12:16.468 --> 00:12:20.148
<v Chris>Yeah, I mean, better than zero, as has been some of my years in the past.

00:12:20.948 --> 00:12:25.468
<v Chris>And that YouTuber one was great. All right, gentlemen, so it's my time to see how I did.

00:12:25.548 --> 00:12:25.948
<v Wes>You're up here.

00:12:26.308 --> 00:12:32.868
<v Chris>Mm-hmm, mm-hmm, mm-hmm. All right, so I said in 2025, this was my first prediction.

00:12:32.868 --> 00:12:34.208
<v Chris>And this was definitely going to happen.

00:12:34.208 --> 00:12:41.628
<v Clips>In 2025, inspired by NixOS, but not based on NixOS, a major distribution-based

00:12:41.628 --> 00:12:48.568
<v Clips>flavor, spin, or remix will ship a declarative configuration system for a reproducible system state.

00:12:48.768 --> 00:12:52.828
<v Chris>Now, there have been forks of NixOS, but I don't think that was my intention here.

00:12:53.908 --> 00:12:58.248
<v Chris>BlendOS is a thing, but I don't think that's probably a mainstream major distro.

00:12:58.768 --> 00:13:04.128
<v Chris>But I'm wondering what you guys think about OpenSUSE, because you have OpenSUSE, Aeon, and Kalpa.

00:13:05.493 --> 00:13:09.813
<v Chris>In 2025, they announced these two different variants, and they have doubled

00:13:09.813 --> 00:13:12.353
<v Chris>down on the zero-config declarative philosophy, they say.

00:13:12.773 --> 00:13:16.913
<v Chris>It's based on micro OS. It uses two specific tools to have declarative setups.

00:13:17.213 --> 00:13:20.593
<v Chris>You typically place these configuration files on a USB drive labeled ignition

00:13:20.593 --> 00:13:24.753
<v Chris>or combustion, and it does disk partitioning, rate arrays, creating users,

00:13:24.893 --> 00:13:26.973
<v Chris>writing files, system units, and software install.

00:13:27.253 --> 00:13:33.013
<v Chris>You do it with a human-readable butane YAML file, which is then compiled into

00:13:33.013 --> 00:13:35.033
<v Chris>a machine-readable ignition JSON file.

00:13:35.733 --> 00:13:39.973
<v Chris>And it can run any bash command, install any RPM package via whatever,

00:13:40.253 --> 00:13:42.913
<v Chris>transactional update, set up your networking, et cetera.

00:13:43.233 --> 00:13:47.393
<v Chris>So I think maybe you could argue that OpenSUSE is dabbling with this declarative setup.

00:13:47.573 --> 00:13:48.973
<v Wes>I have three questions.

00:13:49.133 --> 00:13:49.273
<v Chris>Okay.

00:13:49.293 --> 00:13:49.593
<v Wes>Three things.

00:13:49.833 --> 00:13:49.913
<v Chris>Fair.

00:13:50.233 --> 00:13:53.253
<v Wes>Well, I guess one of them is combined. So you made some notes here.

00:13:53.393 --> 00:13:59.293
<v Wes>The length of the notes combined with the fact that it's you talking about OpenSUSE

00:13:59.293 --> 00:14:02.073
<v Wes>makes it seem like a stretch automatically.

00:14:05.173 --> 00:14:08.873
<v Wes>my other question is like i don't think the ignition stuff is new i don't know

00:14:08.873 --> 00:14:13.253
<v Wes>about the butane so how much of this is a thing that was net new to 2025.

00:14:13.253 --> 00:14:18.233
<v Chris>Well the announcement of aeon and calpa was 2025.

00:14:18.233 --> 00:14:23.773
<v Wes>But was is the declarative or tech they're using well.

00:14:23.773 --> 00:14:28.753
<v Chris>No i don't think so But the distribution that uses the.

00:14:28.753 --> 00:14:29.573
<v Wes>Declarative tech was.

00:14:29.853 --> 00:14:35.733
<v Brent>Yeah. The wording is a major distribution-based flavor or spin or remix will

00:14:35.733 --> 00:14:38.053
<v Brent>ship a declarative configuration system.

00:14:38.253 --> 00:14:40.293
<v Brent>So it only had to ship in this year.

00:14:40.713 --> 00:14:42.173
<v Drew>Okay. Questions.

00:14:42.953 --> 00:14:43.773
<v Brent>All right. What do you think, though?

00:14:44.273 --> 00:14:45.833
<v Drew>Can I download this today?

00:14:46.493 --> 00:14:47.593
<v Chris>Yes, you can.

00:14:47.773 --> 00:14:52.633
<v Drew>Okay. Yeah. So ignition files are not a new thing at all.

00:14:53.213 --> 00:14:54.073
<v Chris>No. No.

00:14:54.073 --> 00:14:58.513
<v Drew>I mean, Cloud in it and the like are...

00:14:59.600 --> 00:15:04.420
<v Chris>Very old but this is this also gives you desktop zero config declarative desktop

00:15:04.420 --> 00:15:09.380
<v Chris>open source setup yeah it's like they're silver blue you could maybe kind of well.

00:15:09.380 --> 00:15:11.860
<v Wes>That's okay see that seems yeah

00:15:11.860 --> 00:15:14.520
<v Wes>i do think maybe you might have to install this on airmaster if you get.

00:15:14.520 --> 00:15:14.880
<v Chris>The point.

00:15:18.860 --> 00:15:26.680
<v Drew>All right so calpa and aon are brand new for 2025 using these ignition setups.

00:15:26.680 --> 00:15:30.540
<v Chris>And butane yeah yeah butane and ignition yeah sure.

00:15:30.540 --> 00:15:32.720
<v Wes>Well you can't have ignition without the fuel source.

00:15:32.720 --> 00:15:35.500
<v Chris>Right see you get it yeah see they're good at naming.

00:15:36.778 --> 00:15:37.638
<v Drew>I'm fine with it.

00:15:38.558 --> 00:15:40.338
<v Chris>Oh! Yes!

00:15:40.738 --> 00:15:40.918
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:15:41.138 --> 00:15:43.978
<v Chris>One point. All right, one point for me. That was a hard point I had to earn,

00:15:44.058 --> 00:15:46.398
<v Chris>but I'm going to take it. I had to work for that one. Yeah.

00:15:46.538 --> 00:15:47.838
<v Wes>Do you feel good about what you've done?

00:15:48.038 --> 00:15:52.158
<v Chris>I mean, I was hoping to see more. I really was. I was hoping to see more.

00:15:52.258 --> 00:15:55.398
<v Chris>And when CacheOS Server Edition came out, I was hoping that would be something like that.

00:15:55.398 --> 00:16:01.218
<v Drew>And this one was a hard one for me to say yes to, because an admission file

00:16:01.218 --> 00:16:03.738
<v Drew>is not really the same thing as a Nix config.

00:16:04.138 --> 00:16:06.158
<v Drew>It's just not. But...

00:16:06.158 --> 00:16:06.418
<v Chris>No.

00:16:06.418 --> 00:16:08.998
<v Brent>But it's arguably declarative, right?

00:16:09.498 --> 00:16:11.178
<v Drew>Technically, it is a declarative config.

00:16:11.538 --> 00:16:12.278
<v Chris>It is, right?

00:16:12.538 --> 00:16:12.778
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:16:13.838 --> 00:16:16.238
<v Chris>You can install your software, your networking, get it all set up.

00:16:17.718 --> 00:16:18.918
<v Drew>Begrudgingly, you get the point.

00:16:19.198 --> 00:16:24.338
<v Chris>I think this next one's not going to be super easy either. Here is my second prediction for 2025.

00:16:25.078 --> 00:16:32.058
<v Clips>In 2025, Debian 13 Trixie will ship, and every desktop that is capable of supporting

00:16:32.058 --> 00:16:36.058
<v Clips>Wayland will have Wayland support turned on by default.

00:16:36.418 --> 00:16:41.658
<v Chris>See, this is going to be a nuanced thing because there are desktops that are technically...

00:16:41.658 --> 00:16:43.718
<v Wes>How many desktops does Devin even ship?

00:16:43.938 --> 00:16:44.998
<v Chris>Well, I pulled the top four.

00:16:45.098 --> 00:16:45.358
<v Wes>Okay.

00:16:45.918 --> 00:16:48.958
<v Chris>I pulled the top four, and once you know it, it's right down the middle.

00:16:49.298 --> 00:16:52.558
<v Chris>So, GNOME 48 is shipping with Waylon by default in Trixie.

00:16:52.678 --> 00:16:56.358
<v Chris>So is Plasma 6.3. Those are both shipping with Waylon by default.

00:16:56.358 --> 00:17:05.338
<v Chris>However, LXQ 2.1 is using X11 by default and does technically support Wayland

00:17:05.338 --> 00:17:11.298
<v Chris>via LabW or LibAWBWC something, but is experimental.

00:17:11.758 --> 00:17:19.038
<v Chris>And XFCE 4.20 also ships with X11 by default, but the team considers it experimental

00:17:19.038 --> 00:17:23.438
<v Chris>and should not be used for regular users and should only be used for testing only.

00:17:23.438 --> 00:17:29.018
<v Chris>so it's literally split down the middle where the two that are on X11 could

00:17:29.018 --> 00:17:33.938
<v Chris>technically support it but are not yet recommended by the projects to run it.

00:17:33.938 --> 00:17:35.138
<v Wes>What does capable mean.

00:17:37.253 --> 00:17:37.853
<v Drew>Hard fail.

00:17:38.273 --> 00:17:44.633
<v Chris>I really, if I just would have left, I could have just kept it a little more vague, you know?

00:17:44.733 --> 00:17:45.653
<v Wes>There is an art to that.

00:17:46.033 --> 00:17:46.233
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:17:46.333 --> 00:17:46.473
<v Chris>Yeah.

00:17:46.693 --> 00:17:48.933
<v Drew>No, that's a hard fail. Sorry.

00:17:49.093 --> 00:17:49.873
<v Chris>All right. Okay.

00:17:50.533 --> 00:17:51.393
<v Drew>I was hoping.

00:17:52.833 --> 00:17:56.573
<v Chris>I blame XFCE and LXQT.

00:17:57.113 --> 00:17:58.893
<v Drew>Experimental means technically capable.

00:17:59.353 --> 00:17:59.753
<v Chris>Okay.

00:18:00.153 --> 00:18:02.753
<v Drew>Turned off by default means you fail.

00:18:03.693 --> 00:18:07.073
<v Chris>It is technically, if I hadn't said technically, I think that would have been a winner.

00:18:08.302 --> 00:18:12.582
<v Chris>Okay, well, I feel a little better about this next one, although at the time

00:18:12.582 --> 00:18:15.342
<v Chris>I was like, hmm, this is going to be a winner, a slam dunk.

00:18:15.442 --> 00:18:19.222
<v Chris>It actually was a nail-biter almost up until the end.

00:18:19.522 --> 00:18:23.802
<v Clips>In 2025, Valve will release Proton 10.0.

00:18:23.942 --> 00:18:27.582
<v Clips>They will tout brand new types of compatibility with Windows games,

00:18:27.602 --> 00:18:31.062
<v Clips>and it will be released before the end of 2025.

00:18:31.062 --> 00:18:34.682
<v Chris>I expected it to actually become much earlier in the year,

00:18:35.042 --> 00:18:42.162
<v Chris>but Proton 10.0 beta was released in April, but Stable did not actually ship

00:18:42.162 --> 00:18:48.042
<v Chris>until November 13th of 2025, and a major update just went out to 10.0,

00:18:48.162 --> 00:18:50.762
<v Chris>version 10.0-4 in late December.

00:18:50.762 --> 00:18:55.062
<v Chris>So this one, I actually just got in under the line when I thought I was getting a slam dunk.

00:18:55.242 --> 00:18:58.442
<v Chris>But, I mean, that one's cut and dry, easily measurable.

00:18:58.922 --> 00:19:02.822
<v Chris>The stable version of Proton 10 shipped on November 13th. What do you think,

00:19:02.882 --> 00:19:03.642
<v Chris>Ref? It's a winner, right?

00:19:04.642 --> 00:19:07.002
<v Drew>What types of new compatibility are there?

00:19:07.702 --> 00:19:12.922
<v Chris>Ah, so many games that previously required Proton Experimental were now moved to the stable branch,

00:19:13.062 --> 00:19:16.442
<v Chris>and they addressed issues with certain games, like Assassin's Creed Shadows,

00:19:16.442 --> 00:19:21.722
<v Chris>that had video playback issues, And another game that had issues that didn't

00:19:21.722 --> 00:19:25.102
<v Chris>work before was Resident Evil Village, which began working with Proton 10.

00:19:25.182 --> 00:19:27.942
<v Chris>There's other games, obviously, but those are the ones that stuck out.

00:19:28.662 --> 00:19:29.682
<v Drew>Okay. Yeah.

00:19:29.822 --> 00:19:30.722
<v Chris>Good. Good to go.

00:19:31.022 --> 00:19:32.962
<v Drew>Yeah. You've taken the lead.

00:19:33.402 --> 00:19:33.642
<v Brent>Dang.

00:19:33.642 --> 00:19:35.022
<v Drew>That brings you up to a two.

00:19:35.582 --> 00:19:39.502
<v Chris>I have two points, Wes Payne. Let's see if you can beat a 2.0.

00:19:40.202 --> 00:19:41.522
<v Wes>I certainly can't.

00:19:41.662 --> 00:19:46.422
<v Chris>I love, well, what I love about you, Wes's predictions, he often shoots for

00:19:46.422 --> 00:19:47.642
<v Chris>the stars and makes it fun.

00:19:48.202 --> 00:19:52.282
<v Chris>So let's see what Wes said would happen in 2025, his first prediction.

00:19:52.562 --> 00:19:59.622
<v Clips>I predict that in 2025, Chris Fisher purchases a RISC-V device that is a RISC-V

00:19:59.622 --> 00:20:02.702
<v Clips>device that has a RISC-V processor as its primary CBU.

00:20:03.490 --> 00:20:04.090
<v Chris>Uh-oh.

00:20:04.270 --> 00:20:05.530
<v Wes>Yeah, you really failed me on this one.

00:20:05.710 --> 00:20:07.850
<v Brent>There's still time. There's still time.

00:20:08.130 --> 00:20:11.330
<v Chris>That is true, but nothing's in my shopping cart, Wes.

00:20:11.950 --> 00:20:13.630
<v Wes>Well, why not? What are you waiting for?

00:20:14.210 --> 00:20:16.270
<v Chris>What do you think, Rev? I think that's a fail right there.

00:20:16.270 --> 00:20:19.790
<v Brent>I'd like to ask here, what was your motivation, Wes? What was your thinking on this one?

00:20:20.110 --> 00:20:24.110
<v Wes>He buys a lot of gadgets for himself, and there's just been a lot of chat about RISC-V.

00:20:24.370 --> 00:20:26.550
<v Chris>Ah, you see, I didn't buy many gadgets this year.

00:20:26.650 --> 00:20:28.750
<v Wes>Yeah. I blame inflation.

00:20:28.970 --> 00:20:29.190
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:20:30.390 --> 00:20:34.130
<v Chris>I was hoping you were right. I think we were feeling like it was going to be

00:20:34.130 --> 00:20:36.990
<v Chris>a big year and it was but just not in a way that impacted and like.

00:20:36.990 --> 00:20:40.930
<v Wes>I could have seen like you know was there like some kind of little tiny like

00:20:40.930 --> 00:20:44.030
<v Wes>old school phony size gadget or terminal or.

00:20:44.030 --> 00:20:44.690
<v Chris>Little development.

00:20:44.690 --> 00:20:45.970
<v Wes>Board that could I don't know.

00:20:45.970 --> 00:20:50.590
<v Chris>Or like a little laptop thingy sort of thing but I think that's a fail ref that.

00:20:50.590 --> 00:20:56.510
<v Drew>Little emulation thing that you bought from like Alibaba or whatever that that doesn't run risk 5.

00:20:56.510 --> 00:20:59.850
<v Chris>It does not then nope sorry,

00:21:02.121 --> 00:21:03.181
<v Chris>All right, zero points.

00:21:03.401 --> 00:21:04.181
<v Brent>Risky prediction.

00:21:04.381 --> 00:21:06.781
<v Chris>Fun prediction. That's one I wish would have happened.

00:21:06.961 --> 00:21:08.261
<v Wes>Maybe you'll get it in this year.

00:21:08.441 --> 00:21:11.201
<v Chris>You never know. Could be the year of RISC-V. You never know.

00:21:11.661 --> 00:21:15.041
<v Chris>All right, Wes's next prediction for 2025.

00:21:15.641 --> 00:21:21.361
<v Clips>I predict that in 2025, a distribution or spin or addition will feature BcacheFS

00:21:21.361 --> 00:21:26.301
<v Clips>as default file system, by which I mean you can go to the website, download an ISO,

00:21:27.181 --> 00:21:29.901
<v Clips>click through the defaults of the installer without having to change anything,

00:21:29.901 --> 00:21:33.001
<v Clips>and you will get BcacheFS as your main file system.

00:21:33.481 --> 00:21:34.141
<v Chris>What do you think.

00:21:34.301 --> 00:21:37.841
<v Wes>Wes? You know. Sadly, this is one I was hoping for, too.

00:21:38.101 --> 00:21:43.821
<v Chris>Yeah. In a way, I think that's gone the opposite direction. I think it's a good setup for 2026.

00:21:44.821 --> 00:21:47.961
<v Wes>True, yeah. We're getting to a point of, I mean, the experimental label might

00:21:47.961 --> 00:21:51.721
<v Wes>actually be off here real soon, too, so that's probably a reasonable precursor

00:21:51.721 --> 00:21:55.241
<v Wes>before it's likely, at least. But I was being hopeful.

00:21:55.721 --> 00:21:59.381
<v Chris>What do you think, Rav? It was hopeful, but seemingly misses the mark?

00:21:59.381 --> 00:22:02.901
<v Drew>It missed the mark. Yeah. Sorry. That's a no go.

00:22:05.336 --> 00:22:11.396
<v Chris>All right. Well, let's see. He may have made up for it with his last prediction for 2025.

00:22:12.376 --> 00:22:16.156
<v Chris>Wes Payne said this was absolutely going to happen in 2025.

00:22:16.576 --> 00:22:21.556
<v Clips>I predict that at the end of 2025, all three of us, Chris, Wes,

00:22:21.736 --> 00:22:27.616
<v Clips>and Brent, are using NixOS stock, you know, regular NixOS, not a derivative,

00:22:27.916 --> 00:22:30.796
<v Clips>as our primary workstation desktop operating system.

00:22:30.796 --> 00:22:35.196
<v Chris>All right, we got a little nuance here. Because this is technically true,

00:22:35.196 --> 00:22:38.076
<v Chris>but technically not, because I'm running Hypervibe on my systems.

00:22:38.236 --> 00:22:39.536
<v Wes>I think Hypervibe counts.

00:22:39.616 --> 00:22:39.936
<v Chris>I think so.

00:22:39.996 --> 00:22:41.656
<v Wes>Because you're just using Nix packages.

00:22:41.876 --> 00:22:42.696
<v Chris>Right, right.

00:22:42.836 --> 00:22:49.076
<v Drew>When you install Hypervibe, do you install Nix and then switch it into Hypervibe?

00:22:49.396 --> 00:22:54.936
<v Chris>Yes, technically I do right now. So is that the moment it switches? I like this line.

00:22:55.276 --> 00:23:00.376
<v Chris>So yes, I am installing mainline Nix, and then I destroy it.

00:23:00.796 --> 00:23:04.956
<v Wes>And there's nothing that you couldn't get with what you have from just a Nix

00:23:04.956 --> 00:23:08.396
<v Wes>file. As long as you could just do that and get what you have.

00:23:08.496 --> 00:23:12.516
<v Chris>Yep. What about you, Brantley? NixOS is your main daily driver?

00:23:13.076 --> 00:23:19.056
<v Brent>Well, I kind of feel like it was my daily driver before the predictions episode from last year.

00:23:19.236 --> 00:23:21.836
<v Brent>So I haven't changed it, I don't think, at all this year.

00:23:22.136 --> 00:23:24.196
<v Brent>So I'm NixOS all the way.

00:23:24.396 --> 00:23:27.056
<v Chris>It is a possibility. It could happen.

00:23:27.736 --> 00:23:30.336
<v Wes>Yeah, we try a lot of distros over the years, so you never know.

00:23:30.336 --> 00:23:32.936
<v Brent>So there's a lot of trying, but I always seem to come back.

00:23:33.356 --> 00:23:36.716
<v Chris>Okay, so what do you think, ref? Can we excuse the hyper-vibe technicality and

00:23:36.716 --> 00:23:37.856
<v Chris>consider this one a winner?

00:23:37.976 --> 00:23:40.176
<v Drew>It's not even a technicality. He just gets it.

00:23:40.636 --> 00:23:41.696
<v Chris>Hey! All right.

00:23:41.836 --> 00:23:42.456
<v Wes>No shout-out.

00:23:43.716 --> 00:23:46.116
<v Drew>That does put him in last place, but I mean.

00:23:46.256 --> 00:23:49.196
<v Chris>That does. One point for Wes Payne. All right.

00:23:49.316 --> 00:23:54.036
<v Chris>So as far as last year's predictions go, Brantley comes in at a 1.5.

00:23:54.196 --> 00:23:55.396
<v Chris>Well done, Brantley. Very nice.

00:23:55.396 --> 00:23:56.276
<v Wes>That half point.

00:23:57.756 --> 00:23:59.476
<v Brent>I didn't even fight for it.

00:24:00.396 --> 00:24:03.736
<v Chris>I come in at a victorious two points.

00:24:03.996 --> 00:24:04.556
<v Wes>Ha ha ha.

00:24:06.245 --> 00:24:11.665
<v Chris>And Wes Payne ranked in at one solid point, which honestly.

00:24:11.885 --> 00:24:13.225
<v Wes>Big beefy point. That's what I say.

00:24:13.405 --> 00:24:16.545
<v Chris>Hey, that one point's doing a heavy lift. That means none of us got a zero.

00:24:17.085 --> 00:24:20.285
<v Chris>That's not too bad for forecasting the future. Really, if you think about it,

00:24:20.565 --> 00:24:21.545
<v Chris>those are pretty good odds.

00:24:21.845 --> 00:24:25.565
<v Chris>I bet you most weathermen aren't that accurate. So we have that going for us.

00:24:29.925 --> 00:24:33.565
<v Chris>Onepassword.com slash unplug. That's the number one and then password.

00:24:33.745 --> 00:24:38.525
<v Chris>And it's unplugged, all lowercase. If your employees bypass security to use

00:24:38.525 --> 00:24:42.285
<v Chris>unapproved apps that they feel they need to do their job, you're not alone.

00:24:42.765 --> 00:24:44.625
<v Chris>Fortunately, with 1Password Extended

00:24:44.625 --> 00:24:48.545
<v Chris>Access Management, security and productivity do not have to be at odds.

00:24:48.725 --> 00:24:52.105
<v Chris>IT and the staff do not have to be at odds.

00:24:52.345 --> 00:24:55.765
<v Chris>And I know that you care about security. And how much do you want to bet that

00:24:55.765 --> 00:24:58.145
<v Chris>everyone in your company cares as much as you?

00:24:58.465 --> 00:25:00.905
<v Chris>I think you probably know the answer to that, unfortunately,

00:25:01.205 --> 00:25:05.145
<v Chris>especially with the growth of SaaS apps. There's just so many different services

00:25:05.145 --> 00:25:06.725
<v Chris>where they can simply sign in and start.

00:25:07.784 --> 00:25:11.824
<v Chris>Helpfully sharing their data. Trelica by 1Password makes security simple for

00:25:11.824 --> 00:25:13.584
<v Chris>every employee on every application.

00:25:14.064 --> 00:25:17.544
<v Chris>Now, what if I told you that one tool could secure hundreds of applications?

00:25:17.784 --> 00:25:24.024
<v Chris>Trelica by 1Password gives IT and security complete oversight of what is really

00:25:24.024 --> 00:25:26.684
<v Chris>a sprawling landscape of SaaS applications.

00:25:26.964 --> 00:25:31.464
<v Chris>And it's company-managed or unmanaged, the shadow type IT.

00:25:31.884 --> 00:25:34.884
<v Chris>Find out how many SaaS applications are being used at your company.

00:25:35.004 --> 00:25:38.504
<v Chris>Know right now. And if you can't keep count, You're not alone. Don't worry.

00:25:39.024 --> 00:25:41.544
<v Chris>That's where Trellica by 1Password will help you discover and secure those.

00:25:41.744 --> 00:25:43.804
<v Chris>Even the ones you don't know about will go out, discover it,

00:25:43.864 --> 00:25:46.864
<v Chris>has profiles so it knows about them. You can find the redundant spends.

00:25:47.864 --> 00:25:52.004
<v Chris>And it gives you processes for onboarding and offboarding staff.

00:25:52.764 --> 00:25:57.444
<v Chris>Not always an easy process, so it's nice to have something that helps you manage the spend and that.

00:25:57.684 --> 00:26:01.444
<v Chris>Trellica by 1Password will help you take control of your SaaS environment and

00:26:01.444 --> 00:26:04.584
<v Chris>give you visibility, automated workflows, and cost optimization.

00:26:05.484 --> 00:26:10.244
<v Chris>That's really powerful. You should go check it out. Go to 1Password.com slash unplugged.

00:26:10.284 --> 00:26:13.264
<v Chris>You can take the first step to better security for your team by securing credentials

00:26:13.264 --> 00:26:17.504
<v Chris>and protecting every application, even the unmanaged shadow IT.

00:26:18.004 --> 00:26:23.584
<v Chris>Learn more at 1Password.com slash unplugged. Remember, you can reduce unnecessary

00:26:23.584 --> 00:26:28.284
<v Chris>costs by analyzing your app usage to identify and eliminate those unneeded and

00:26:28.284 --> 00:26:30.444
<v Chris>unused licenses and redundant apps.

00:26:30.624 --> 00:26:32.624
<v Chris>That's just the tip of the iceberg.

00:26:32.904 --> 00:26:37.484
<v Chris>There's so much more. Go learn at 1password.com slash unplugged.

00:26:37.564 --> 00:26:41.124
<v Chris>That's 1password.com slash unplugged, all lowercase.

00:26:44.542 --> 00:26:50.522
<v Drew>All right gentlemen it is the time that we've all been waiting for it's our 2026 predictions,

00:26:52.142 --> 00:26:57.522
<v Drew>now you guys are really going to have to impress me on this i am not going to

00:26:57.522 --> 00:27:04.922
<v Drew>take any slack on this your predictions need to be concise they need to be accurate

00:27:04.922 --> 00:27:08.962
<v Drew>and what you say and how you say it matters.

00:27:09.982 --> 00:27:15.342
<v Drew>So let's go. Brent, you're up first. What is your first prediction?

00:27:16.122 --> 00:27:19.822
<v Brent>Well, after that, I'm feeling pretty nervous because I didn't workshop any of my predictions.

00:27:20.362 --> 00:27:23.822
<v Brent>So I might need a little help. So I'll give you the premise here.

00:27:23.942 --> 00:27:32.722
<v Brent>So this is my first shot at it. I believe in 2026, we will see local AI assistants

00:27:32.722 --> 00:27:38.462
<v Brent>like Lightspeed, be available in two other major distros.

00:27:38.822 --> 00:27:42.062
<v Brent>So two other major distros will ship something akin to Lightspeed.

00:27:43.719 --> 00:27:46.159
<v Chris>Okay, so not Lightspeed specifically, but something akin to it.

00:27:46.339 --> 00:27:49.579
<v Brent>Yeah, something like their own version of it or their own flavor or their own

00:27:49.579 --> 00:27:50.799
<v Brent>take on it, something like that.

00:27:50.979 --> 00:27:55.379
<v Brent>I'm not saying exactly how it'll be architected, just that someone will implement

00:27:55.379 --> 00:27:57.419
<v Brent>this sort of AI in your pocket.

00:27:57.419 --> 00:27:58.979
<v Wes>What do we mean by Lightspeed?

00:27:58.979 --> 00:28:10.759
<v Brent>Yeah, what I mean is like having an AI companion be available in the distro,

00:28:11.059 --> 00:28:15.259
<v Brent>like a distro native available feature.

00:28:15.399 --> 00:28:16.979
<v Drew>The word you're looking for is agentic.

00:28:18.079 --> 00:28:18.799
<v Brent>Gross.

00:28:19.819 --> 00:28:21.319
<v Wes>Can we get that as a...

00:28:26.739 --> 00:28:29.739
<v Brent>Yeah so maybe i need a little help wording all that because there's a lot of

00:28:29.739 --> 00:28:36.599
<v Brent>buzzwords and stuff but really it's just like uh in 2026 two other major distributions

00:28:36.599 --> 00:28:41.399
<v Brent>will make available a native agentic ai i.

00:28:41.399 --> 00:28:42.519
<v Drew>Would go with in-house.

00:28:42.519 --> 00:28:45.039
<v Brent>Okay all right i.

00:28:45.039 --> 00:28:48.019
<v Drew>Think that's getting at what you're what you're trying to describe here.

00:28:48.019 --> 00:28:53.219
<v Chris>So when we say in-house does that mean say it has to be like a canonical developed LLM.

00:28:53.919 --> 00:28:54.319
<v Brent>Hmm.

00:28:54.739 --> 00:28:56.059
<v Chris>Is that what, when we say in house means.

00:28:56.319 --> 00:28:59.799
<v Brent>I don't think so because that's a much bigger lift than just,

00:29:00.815 --> 00:29:03.975
<v Brent>having some blessed interface is.

00:29:03.975 --> 00:29:07.795
<v Chris>The definition then that it's a local thing it's not running on a cloud provider

00:29:07.795 --> 00:29:10.055
<v Chris>like open ai or something like that but it's something that.

00:29:10.055 --> 00:29:13.075
<v Brent>Runs on premise that's also

00:29:13.075 --> 00:29:17.355
<v Brent>quite restrictive i don't know if i want to commit to that okay okay i but i

00:29:17.355 --> 00:29:25.875
<v Brent>do think the interface itself has to be created by the distro so oh this is

00:29:25.875 --> 00:29:30.795
<v Brent>something like the distro So it's part of their like path,

00:29:31.055 --> 00:29:35.455
<v Brent>their feature set to offer this as a, as a, I don't know, service.

00:29:36.035 --> 00:29:39.735
<v Drew>So a minor technicality here, but that's not quite what.

00:29:39.735 --> 00:29:40.435
<v Brent>Those are a lot of them.

00:29:40.755 --> 00:29:44.675
<v Drew>That's okay. Yeah. That's not quite what Lightspeed is. Lightspeed is like a

00:29:44.675 --> 00:29:47.655
<v Drew>helper for specifically Ansible, right?

00:29:48.015 --> 00:29:52.515
<v Brent>Oh yeah. But that's kind of the ish I'm aiming at.

00:29:52.515 --> 00:29:59.335
<v Drew>Uh red hat does have its own in-house agentic ai for rel red hat enterprise

00:29:59.335 --> 00:30:02.015
<v Drew>linux and i think that's really more what you're getting at.

00:30:02.015 --> 00:30:04.395
<v Brent>Okay sure i i couldn't remember what it was called.

00:30:04.395 --> 00:30:09.415
<v Drew>Well and it's that's fine and it's worth pointing out that that particular agent

00:30:09.415 --> 00:30:14.535
<v Drew>can be configured to talk to multiple different llms yeah.

00:30:14.535 --> 00:30:20.995
<v Brent>So my my real aim here is that it will be specifically aimed at helping you

00:30:20.995 --> 00:30:22.675
<v Brent>manage the distribution.

00:30:22.675 --> 00:30:32.335
<v Drew>Okay so i think what you're looking for is an in-house interface to talk with

00:30:32.335 --> 00:30:38.615
<v Drew>llms to answer questions about your operating system is that.

00:30:38.615 --> 00:30:40.755
<v Brent>Uh yeah i guess.

00:30:40.755 --> 00:30:42.395
<v Drew>That's what we're looking for yeah.

00:30:42.395 --> 00:30:45.815
<v Chris>Like uh like in-house By in-house, we mean distro-developed, right?

00:30:46.055 --> 00:30:50.595
<v Chris>So a distro-developed interface to communicate with an LLM to help manage your system.

00:30:51.055 --> 00:30:51.875
<v Drew>I like it.

00:30:52.475 --> 00:30:53.195
<v Chris>How's that, Brent?

00:30:53.975 --> 00:30:57.215
<v Brent>I'm noting it down because to communicate, I went, yeah, yeah.

00:30:57.835 --> 00:31:02.695
<v Chris>A distro-developed interface to communicate with an LLM to help manage your system.

00:31:03.809 --> 00:31:07.349
<v Chris>And that doesn't necessarily specify local, right? It could be, you know.

00:31:07.549 --> 00:31:10.509
<v Brent>I mean, local would be nice, but I'm not going to restrict myself to that.

00:31:10.689 --> 00:31:13.609
<v Chris>I mean, if I'm Shuttleworth and I'm looking for some AI money,

00:31:13.769 --> 00:31:18.329
<v Chris>I'm probably thinking, how do I add a little AI magic to the canonical cloud

00:31:18.329 --> 00:31:19.449
<v Chris>and really get everybody worked up?

00:31:19.569 --> 00:31:24.449
<v Brent>That's where I'm going. All right. I think I can try a first go at a lock here. You ready?

00:31:25.029 --> 00:31:26.029
<v Chris>Yeah. Give us a first pass.

00:31:26.029 --> 00:31:34.049
<v Brent>In 2026 i believe two other major distributions will make available an in-house

00:31:34.049 --> 00:31:41.069
<v Brent>distro developed interface to communicate with an llm to help manage your system what.

00:31:41.069 --> 00:31:45.449
<v Chris>If you just changed other to non-redhat i don't know because you're not other

00:31:45.449 --> 00:31:46.149
<v Chris>we might not know who you're.

00:31:46.149 --> 00:31:48.209
<v Brent>Talking yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah fair other.

00:31:48.209 --> 00:31:49.869
<v Chris>Than that what do you think i think it's pretty good that seems.

00:31:49.869 --> 00:31:51.129
<v Drew>Workable yeah real close.

00:31:51.129 --> 00:31:52.189
<v Chris>Okay brantley.

00:31:52.189 --> 00:31:57.469
<v Brent>Lock her third time's jam I believe in 2026,

00:31:57.789 --> 00:32:05.269
<v Brent>we will see two major non-Red Hat distributions make available an in-house distro-developed

00:32:05.269 --> 00:32:09.209
<v Brent>interface to communicate with LLMs to help manage your system.

00:32:11.009 --> 00:32:16.409
<v Chris>All right, it's officially locked. Number one is down, Brent.

00:32:16.709 --> 00:32:18.269
<v Brent>It's anxiety-inducing.

00:32:18.529 --> 00:32:19.449
<v Drew>It is, isn't it?

00:32:19.569 --> 00:32:22.109
<v Brent>What did I just commit to? what.

00:32:22.109 --> 00:32:26.109
<v Chris>Is uh your second prediction for 2026.

00:32:26.109 --> 00:32:29.669
<v Brent>Uh this is going to ride a little on the success of my

00:32:29.669 --> 00:32:34.609
<v Brent>youtube prediction from last year uh so my prediction will be that a youtube

00:32:34.609 --> 00:32:40.889
<v Brent>personality will start an opinionated distribution a la omacube or omarchie

00:32:40.889 --> 00:32:47.089
<v Brent>and it will be reported by its foss and the news stack to make it measurable.

00:32:48.006 --> 00:32:50.846
<v Chris>Why are you specifying particular news outlets, though?

00:32:50.986 --> 00:32:53.986
<v Brent>Because they're like any old YouTuber. And I didn't want to say,

00:32:53.986 --> 00:32:57.586
<v Brent>like, someone over a million subscribers or something, but I'm open to,

00:32:57.586 --> 00:33:00.106
<v Brent>like, suggestions for better measurability.

00:33:00.586 --> 00:33:02.046
<v Chris>I don't think I would limit it to any.

00:33:02.586 --> 00:33:04.066
<v Brent>How do you make it measurable, then?

00:33:04.906 --> 00:33:08.646
<v Chris>Well, just any of the Linux news outlets that we follow, I think.

00:33:08.846 --> 00:33:08.966
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:33:09.266 --> 00:33:10.966
<v Chris>What if Pharonix wrote about it? And then you didn't.

00:33:11.306 --> 00:33:15.426
<v Brent>That was my exact first thought, but Pharonix did not write about Omar G or

00:33:15.426 --> 00:33:16.586
<v Brent>Omocube. So I was like, oh.

00:33:16.586 --> 00:33:18.726
<v Chris>That's true. Yeah, they probably wouldn't. You're probably right.

00:33:19.026 --> 00:33:22.586
<v Chris>But so you're saying essentially the core of what you're saying is that we're

00:33:22.586 --> 00:33:23.826
<v Chris>going to see a YouTuber distro.

00:33:23.946 --> 00:33:26.406
<v Brent>Yes. Yes. That's really the core of it.

00:33:26.846 --> 00:33:27.046
<v Chris>Interesting.

00:33:27.306 --> 00:33:27.606
<v Brent>And so.

00:33:27.746 --> 00:33:28.386
<v Chris>What do you think of that?

00:33:29.006 --> 00:33:30.166
<v Wes>Like a Prime OS?

00:33:30.966 --> 00:33:35.786
<v Chris>Oh, yeah. For Primogen, I can see a Prime OS. Or you can see a PewDiePie distro.

00:33:36.806 --> 00:33:37.146
<v Brent>Mm-hmm.

00:33:37.746 --> 00:33:38.346
<v Chris>Mm-hmm.

00:33:38.466 --> 00:33:43.126
<v Brent>So it just needs to make that prediction measurable because I think it's gold.

00:33:43.606 --> 00:33:45.106
<v Chris>Well, I think we'd find out about it.

00:33:45.106 --> 00:33:50.706
<v Drew>I mean so we could see linus linux too right yeah sure right.

00:33:50.706 --> 00:33:55.466
<v Brent>Well ref what what is a good measure for you at the end of the year.

00:33:55.466 --> 00:34:05.406
<v Drew>Major youtuber with x number of followers minimum creates a youtube or it creates

00:34:05.406 --> 00:34:09.686
<v Drew>a linux distribution would be the way i would do it and not mention where it's.

00:34:09.686 --> 00:34:14.006
<v Brent>Reported at all all right all right okay yeah i don't know if i want to say

00:34:14.006 --> 00:34:18.526
<v Brent>a million that's a lot yeah i'll say 500k okay.

00:34:18.526 --> 00:34:19.326
<v Chris>That seems fair yeah.

00:34:19.326 --> 00:34:20.146
<v Brent>Yeah all right i.

00:34:20.146 --> 00:34:26.006
<v Drew>Mean you know 100k is like the base of like you've kind of made it right so 500k is yeah you're.

00:34:26.006 --> 00:34:28.906
<v Brent>It's like someone with some recognition you're not

00:34:28.906 --> 00:34:35.946
<v Brent>like the biggest of big yeah all right yeah i believe in 2026 we will see released

00:34:35.946 --> 00:34:42.246
<v Brent>a youtube personality that starts an opinionated distribution similar to Omacube

00:34:42.246 --> 00:34:47.526
<v Brent>and this YouTuber will have more than 500,000 followers.

00:34:49.780 --> 00:34:52.240
<v Chris>Okay. A YouTuber distro.

00:34:52.620 --> 00:34:55.300
<v Brent>I can only imagine how great that's going to be.

00:34:55.300 --> 00:34:56.400
<v Chris>Can you imagine reviewing that?

00:34:56.900 --> 00:34:57.940
<v Wes>Well, Brent's going to have it.

00:34:57.960 --> 00:35:00.140
<v Drew>Oh, God. It better be called Influencer OS.

00:35:03.660 --> 00:35:06.460
<v Chris>Oh, man. That would be good. That would be good.

00:35:07.140 --> 00:35:11.880
<v Chris>Okay, Brent. Why don't you dazzle us with your third prediction for 2026?

00:35:12.780 --> 00:35:17.280
<v Brent>Okay. This one was hard, but you'll help me.

00:35:18.220 --> 00:35:24.140
<v Brent>In 2026, I believe the Linux Foundation will start a new foundation.

00:35:25.600 --> 00:35:28.580
<v Chris>Are you serious? Are you serious?

00:35:29.360 --> 00:35:36.180
<v Brent>No, I'm not serious. The question is, how many tens of foundations will they start?

00:35:36.280 --> 00:35:41.200
<v Chris>That would be a fun one to guess. Or could you do a range like more than three?

00:35:41.200 --> 00:35:41.720
<v Drew>Yeah, over, under.

00:35:41.780 --> 00:35:42.560
<v Wes>Within abundance.

00:35:43.340 --> 00:35:46.180
<v Brent>10 to 13? Or is it more like 13 to 15?

00:35:49.400 --> 00:35:51.360
<v Brent>All right. I have a real one if you need one.

00:35:51.880 --> 00:35:52.380
<v Chris>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:35:52.580 --> 00:35:59.520
<v Brent>All right. In 2026, I believe there would be an XZ style breach in another widely

00:35:59.520 --> 00:36:04.680
<v Brent>used open source project, specifically an inside man style compromise.

00:36:05.440 --> 00:36:06.000
<v Chris>Ooh.

00:36:08.727 --> 00:36:13.967
<v Chris>An X, Z style breach. And then you say specifically an inside man.

00:36:14.107 --> 00:36:16.887
<v Chris>So somebody that already has like commit access to the project is kind of what you're saying.

00:36:16.887 --> 00:36:20.747
<v Brent>Someone who's infiltrated a project and gained some trust. And then,

00:36:20.747 --> 00:36:25.927
<v Brent>you know, we discover that, oh, wait, they're not the person we thought they were.

00:36:26.047 --> 00:36:28.287
<v Brent>And they're trying to do some maliciousness.

00:36:28.567 --> 00:36:32.847
<v Chris>So you could say something like a vulnerability via trusted commit access.

00:36:33.787 --> 00:36:34.267
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:36:34.347 --> 00:36:39.007
<v Chris>Or something, right? Is that seeming? and I'm you know it would depend on that

00:36:39.007 --> 00:36:43.307
<v Chris>actually getting coverage but for us to find it probably but assuming it's even

00:36:43.307 --> 00:36:45.327
<v Chris>if it's close to xz style yeah.

00:36:45.327 --> 00:36:48.807
<v Wes>Right if it's if it has an impact then there'll be some kind of security coverage you'd think.

00:36:48.807 --> 00:36:53.547
<v Chris>Yeah it seems reasonable what do you think refs yeah yeah.

00:36:53.547 --> 00:36:59.367
<v Brent>No notes I missed the verbiage you used there you said vulnerability via trust.

00:36:59.367 --> 00:37:04.667
<v Chris>Base I think it was something like a um a vulnerability will be discovered in

00:37:04.667 --> 00:37:08.627
<v Chris>an open source project that what did i say after that yeah.

00:37:08.627 --> 00:37:11.807
<v Wes>Right because it's not that it's not just that there's a vulnerability in the code it's.

00:37:11.807 --> 00:37:12.247
<v Chris>That this was.

00:37:12.247 --> 00:37:13.027
<v Wes>Put there by.

00:37:13.027 --> 00:37:16.187
<v Chris>A trusted somebody has access yeah yeah

00:37:16.187 --> 00:37:19.227
<v Chris>because that

00:37:19.227 --> 00:37:22.127
<v Chris>is a stinker that is a real stinker and you know it seems

00:37:22.127 --> 00:37:25.287
<v Chris>plausible because a revenue source really could become this

00:37:25.287 --> 00:37:28.407
<v Chris>is horrible to say and awful when you consider open source projects need more

00:37:28.407 --> 00:37:32.247
<v Chris>funding but a twisted development of this could be a revenue source is becoming

00:37:32.247 --> 00:37:37.307
<v Chris>this already where you sell a well-respected well-established trusted account

00:37:37.307 --> 00:37:40.587
<v Chris>and you can make more money than the free software project makes in an entire

00:37:40.587 --> 00:37:43.867
<v Chris>year just to sell that account to get you know it's just awful.

00:37:43.867 --> 00:37:45.907
<v Brent>It's not i feel really bummed about my prediction.

00:37:45.907 --> 00:37:47.787
<v Chris>Yeah don't put those ideas in.

00:37:47.787 --> 00:37:50.807
<v Brent>There nobody listens to this show though right.

00:37:52.067 --> 00:37:56.427
<v Chris>All right i think you got something all right all right i.

00:37:56.427 --> 00:38:01.787
<v Brent>Believe in 2026 we will see a vulnerability in an open source project via trust

00:38:01.787 --> 00:38:05.447
<v Brent>commit access, similar to the XZ style breach.

00:38:07.995 --> 00:38:13.055
<v Chris>Okay, that's three pretty solid predictions there. What do you think?

00:38:13.295 --> 00:38:16.835
<v Chris>Raph, this is your chance to get a few in. Enjoying the fun.

00:38:17.155 --> 00:38:18.155
<v Wes>Stretch your wings.

00:38:18.315 --> 00:38:21.315
<v Chris>Yeah. You got a prediction for 2026?

00:38:21.655 --> 00:38:26.555
<v Drew>I do. I've got a few. So first one is maybe the spiciest.

00:38:27.255 --> 00:38:31.815
<v Drew>I think that NVIDIA is going to potentially exit the consumer sector.

00:38:32.375 --> 00:38:33.295
<v Wes>I like that.

00:38:33.295 --> 00:38:40.155
<v Drew>The way that I would state this is that NVIDIA releases no consumer hardware cards in 2026.

00:38:40.475 --> 00:38:41.095
<v Chris>Oh, man.

00:38:41.795 --> 00:38:46.635
<v Brent>So, like, similar to what Micron has done, they just kind of pivoted to non-consumer. Wow.

00:38:47.275 --> 00:38:49.975
<v Chris>That would really hurt. But again, like, I guess it wouldn't really impact me

00:38:49.975 --> 00:38:52.035
<v Chris>because I haven't been able to buy NVIDIA cards for about six years.

00:38:52.215 --> 00:38:52.455
<v Drew>Yeah, yeah.

00:38:53.055 --> 00:38:54.935
<v Chris>I keep waiting for the prices to come down.

00:38:55.555 --> 00:38:56.715
<v Drew>They just keep going up.

00:38:57.175 --> 00:38:57.675
<v Chris>Uh-huh.

00:38:57.795 --> 00:38:58.195
<v Drew>Yeah, yeah.

00:38:59.055 --> 00:38:59.415
<v Chris>Yeah.

00:38:59.535 --> 00:39:00.375
<v Brent>This is dark.

00:39:00.375 --> 00:39:05.015
<v Chris>Boy, this would really be a sideways tilt to the PC manufacturing business.

00:39:06.155 --> 00:39:09.735
<v Chris>So that's pretty solid. I mean, NVIDIA exits the consumer business is a pretty

00:39:09.735 --> 00:39:11.575
<v Chris>solid, succinct prediction.

00:39:11.835 --> 00:39:14.855
<v Chris>I don't really have any notes there. Yeah, I think you can lock that in.

00:39:15.255 --> 00:39:15.835
<v Drew>All right.

00:39:18.217 --> 00:39:23.817
<v Drew>In 2026, NVIDIA will release zero consumer graphics cards.

00:39:28.177 --> 00:39:29.917
<v Chris>I hope you're wrong. I hope you're wrong.

00:39:29.997 --> 00:39:31.837
<v Drew>Me too. But, you know, I mean.

00:39:32.857 --> 00:39:36.257
<v Chris>Because, like, where else am I going to get a used card in five or six years?

00:39:36.637 --> 00:39:37.757
<v Chris>Right? That's what I'm looking for.

00:39:38.197 --> 00:39:42.917
<v Drew>AMD and NVIDIA, or no, AMD and Intel are both working it.

00:39:43.417 --> 00:39:47.857
<v Drew>And there's that Chinese company that's trying to start making cards.

00:39:47.857 --> 00:39:51.477
<v Drew>I don't remember their name, but, you know, maybe it gives some breathing room

00:39:51.477 --> 00:39:52.997
<v Drew>to the market. We'll see.

00:39:53.117 --> 00:39:58.177
<v Chris>Come on, Ark. Come on, Ark. This is your moment. Okay. Mr. Drew,

00:39:58.357 --> 00:39:59.557
<v Chris>do you have a second prediction?

00:39:59.737 --> 00:39:59.897
<v Drew>Sure.

00:40:00.037 --> 00:40:00.477
<v Chris>For 2026.

00:40:00.777 --> 00:40:05.817
<v Drew>So my second prediction is security-based. I believe that a major vulnerability

00:40:05.817 --> 00:40:13.297
<v Drew>of CVSS 9.0 or greater will be found somewhere in the base Kubernetes components.

00:40:13.957 --> 00:40:16.637
<v Chris>Ooh. 9.0 is putting a real number on it.

00:40:16.757 --> 00:40:17.097
<v Wes>Mm-hmm.

00:40:18.017 --> 00:40:20.197
<v Chris>Not an eight. You're going for a nine.

00:40:20.697 --> 00:40:21.137
<v Drew>Major.

00:40:22.097 --> 00:40:24.837
<v Brent>Wait, is this like inside baseball? You got some kind of...

00:40:25.765 --> 00:40:29.685
<v Chris>It's just a very complicated stack. There's a lot that can. Yeah.

00:40:29.985 --> 00:40:33.285
<v Brent>Have we seen any of these previously? Like, is this a trend?

00:40:33.545 --> 00:40:36.225
<v Chris>I mean, I almost feel like it averages out to one a year, but I'm not sure.

00:40:37.225 --> 00:40:42.365
<v Wes>The only possible issue I can see is in the base Kubernetes component.

00:40:42.585 --> 00:40:43.285
<v Chris>What is that?

00:40:43.545 --> 00:40:48.405
<v Wes>Yeah. Could you argue for some optional networking component that you were labeling as base?

00:40:48.405 --> 00:40:53.245
<v Drew>No, no. I'm not talking like no CSI drivers that are outside of base Kubernetes,

00:40:53.245 --> 00:41:02.125
<v Drew>that sort of thing. uh we're talking like in kubernetes uh not add-ons right okay.

00:41:02.125 --> 00:41:05.825
<v Chris>So base as in like but how do you define what you would define is what you would

00:41:05.825 --> 00:41:08.565
<v Chris>define as like the base thing to just have kubernetes operational.

00:41:08.565 --> 00:41:15.665
<v Drew>Yeah um that is a good question of how to how to state that effectively well

00:41:15.665 --> 00:41:21.085
<v Drew>and it it is also worth stating that some csi drivers are in base kubernetes right,

00:41:22.365 --> 00:41:23.665
<v Drew>All right. All right.

00:41:23.925 --> 00:41:25.145
<v Chris>There's nuance here.

00:41:25.705 --> 00:41:26.705
<v Wes>And a lot of yellow.

00:41:27.425 --> 00:41:31.125
<v Chris>What about something like, what about like using sort of cheat language in a

00:41:31.125 --> 00:41:36.085
<v Chris>way like a vendor shipped version of Kubernetes?

00:41:36.185 --> 00:41:41.245
<v Drew>I'm thinking more that it's a component that exists within the Kubernetes GitHub.

00:41:42.865 --> 00:41:45.025
<v Wes>Okay. That's okay. That's concrete.

00:41:45.385 --> 00:41:49.325
<v Chris>Yeah. GitHub. Okay. Yeah. That could be lockable right there, I think then.

00:41:49.565 --> 00:41:53.685
<v Drew>All right. So let's go with, in 2026,

00:41:54.005 --> 00:42:01.625
<v Drew>a major vulnerability of CVSS 9.0 or greater will be found in a component of

00:42:01.625 --> 00:42:06.465
<v Drew>Kubernetes that exists in the Kubernetes official GitHub.

00:42:09.019 --> 00:42:12.999
<v Chris>True, bringing the spice. Damn, sizzle to those.

00:42:13.119 --> 00:42:13.259
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:42:13.819 --> 00:42:17.219
<v Chris>Okay, all right. So do you have a third prediction for 2026?

00:42:17.559 --> 00:42:24.259
<v Drew>Yeah, yeah, this last one's cheap. I think global use of Linux will breach 10%

00:42:24.259 --> 00:42:25.619
<v Drew>in the Steam hardware survey.

00:42:25.739 --> 00:42:27.159
<v Wes>Let's hope so.

00:42:27.479 --> 00:42:31.539
<v Chris>So you think it's going to, I mean, that would technically be a double. That would be a double.

00:42:31.679 --> 00:42:32.579
<v Drew>It's trending up, yeah.

00:42:33.259 --> 00:42:33.659
<v Chris>Yeah.

00:42:33.919 --> 00:42:39.679
<v Drew>And a Windows 11 has been really biffing it. So, I don't know,

00:42:39.939 --> 00:42:43.879
<v Drew>maybe, and Steam machines are coming back.

00:42:44.619 --> 00:42:50.119
<v Chris>You know, I heard somebody say this weekend that's been using Linux for a few

00:42:50.119 --> 00:42:52.599
<v Chris>months, and they said, you know,

00:42:52.659 --> 00:42:56.419
<v Chris>I feel really great because I'm early to Linux. And I thought, you know.

00:42:56.559 --> 00:43:00.339
<v Brent>Wow. Well, it depends who you're comparing yourself to, I guess.

00:43:00.739 --> 00:43:03.199
<v Chris>And which adoption wave you're thinking of, right?

00:43:03.339 --> 00:43:04.059
<v Brent>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:43:04.059 --> 00:43:07.119
<v Chris>Yeah, so you may be right. There may be a whole wave coming,

00:43:07.419 --> 00:43:10.479
<v Chris>and 10% may be. I think it's the PewDiePie effect.

00:43:10.899 --> 00:43:11.219
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:43:11.339 --> 00:43:14.459
<v Chris>I would love to see it. I would love to see it. All right, well, let's log it in.

00:43:14.559 --> 00:43:14.959
<v Drew>All right.

00:43:17.066 --> 00:43:24.866
<v Drew>In 2026, global use of Linux will crest over 10% in the Steam Hardware Survey.

00:43:26.506 --> 00:43:27.846
<v Chris>Woo-hoo-hoo-hoo!

00:43:28.146 --> 00:43:28.406
<v Brent>Wow.

00:43:28.586 --> 00:43:29.626
<v Wes>Let's go Linux!

00:43:29.666 --> 00:43:32.706
<v Chris>I like it. It's a couple of hard hitters and a really positive one there,

00:43:32.766 --> 00:43:34.046
<v Chris>like a moonshot. That's great.

00:43:34.466 --> 00:43:38.826
<v Chris>That's a nice mix. That's a nice mix. All right, Wes Payne, are you going for

00:43:38.826 --> 00:43:42.786
<v Chris>a W this year? What do you think? How are your 2026 predictions looking?

00:43:42.946 --> 00:43:44.006
<v Wes>We're about to find out.

00:43:44.206 --> 00:43:49.486
<v Brent>I wonder if Wes's theme will be the dark one. this year or just the very like

00:43:49.486 --> 00:43:52.786
<v Brent>kind of spot on well calculated one you always flip.

00:43:52.786 --> 00:43:58.986
<v Wes>Well i'm going with hopeful for my first one okay a consumer oriented nas is

00:43:58.986 --> 00:44:02.926
<v Wes>announced that uses bcash fs under the hood oh.

00:44:02.926 --> 00:44:07.586
<v Chris>And now could that be an existing vendor that just updates their os.

00:44:07.586 --> 00:44:11.406
<v Wes>That would be my intention whether or not i've conveyed that or not we should decide.

00:44:11.406 --> 00:44:15.206
<v Chris>And it doesn't necessarily mean that when you install it it uses bcash by default

00:44:15.206 --> 00:44:16.526
<v Chris>but it just has support for Bcash?

00:44:17.406 --> 00:44:19.546
<v Wes>I think that means it's using it.

00:44:19.826 --> 00:44:20.966
<v Chris>Okay. Okay.

00:44:21.106 --> 00:44:27.746
<v Brent>I have a question. Is this, when you say consumer-oriented NAS,

00:44:27.866 --> 00:44:30.046
<v Brent>do you mean hardware or do you mean software?

00:44:32.586 --> 00:44:33.026
<v Wes>Either.

00:44:33.746 --> 00:44:35.906
<v Chris>So it could be an ISO, it could be a product pre-built.

00:44:36.086 --> 00:44:36.186
<v Wes>Yeah.

00:44:36.306 --> 00:44:36.486
<v Brent>Okay.

00:44:37.566 --> 00:44:40.506
<v Chris>I'd love to see it. It does feel a little long-shotty.

00:44:40.686 --> 00:44:42.046
<v Brent>It does feel a little long-shotty.

00:44:42.966 --> 00:44:48.386
<v Chris>So you're basically, You would lock in a vendor, a NAS vendor will announce,

00:44:48.546 --> 00:44:49.446
<v Chris>doesn't mean they shipped it.

00:44:50.777 --> 00:44:51.397
<v Drew>Just announce.

00:44:51.937 --> 00:44:52.337
<v Brent>Announce.

00:44:53.337 --> 00:44:54.957
<v Chris>Bcash FS being used under the hood.

00:44:54.957 --> 00:44:57.757
<v Brent>Oh, that's a good trick. They don't have to actually make anything.

00:44:58.317 --> 00:45:01.757
<v Chris>That is. It might not ship until 2027, but it's announced in 2027.

00:45:03.477 --> 00:45:03.877
<v Brent>Cheater.

00:45:04.097 --> 00:45:07.197
<v Chris>What do you think, ref? I think that's actually, I think that's, I don't know.

00:45:07.897 --> 00:45:09.417
<v Drew>I think we're close. It's a little weaselly.

00:45:09.517 --> 00:45:10.017
<v Chris>But it's clever.

00:45:10.177 --> 00:45:10.977
<v Wes>It's reasonable.

00:45:12.357 --> 00:45:18.077
<v Drew>Maybe offers Bcash FS as a default option Because a lot of these NAS vendors,

00:45:18.077 --> 00:45:26.357
<v Drew>you will have an option of what underlying file system to use, right?

00:45:26.997 --> 00:45:31.817
<v Wes>Yeah. Okay. Sure. Okay. So what do we think here? What was the phrasing you liked for the NAS?

00:45:33.137 --> 00:45:36.157
<v Drew>Like it's in the dropdown? I don't know. I don't know exactly how to describe it.

00:45:36.157 --> 00:45:39.477
<v Brent>So not necessarily the default, but an available file system feature.

00:45:39.477 --> 00:45:43.137
<v Drew>But it is available by default during installation.

00:45:44.317 --> 00:45:46.557
<v Chris>Oh, during installation. Okay.

00:45:46.597 --> 00:45:47.337
<v Drew>What do you say to that.

00:45:47.357 --> 00:45:47.637
<v Brent>I guess?

00:45:48.297 --> 00:45:50.517
<v Chris>Well, because here's what it is. This is going to be, so say Unraid,

00:45:50.637 --> 00:45:55.597
<v Chris>for example, they support NTFS and Extended 2, but during installation,

00:45:55.597 --> 00:46:00.297
<v Chris>it's not going to deploy those on the disk, but if you put a disk in with NTFS,

00:46:00.397 --> 00:46:02.137
<v Chris>it would support it, and you could use it.

00:46:02.257 --> 00:46:04.457
<v Drew>So maybe not during installation, but during setup.

00:46:05.677 --> 00:46:07.817
<v Chris>So then for this to, right, because then by that definition,

00:46:07.957 --> 00:46:11.837
<v Chris>for this to win, Unraid would just need to ship an update that includes BcacheFS support.

00:46:11.917 --> 00:46:12.337
<v Brent>Yes, true.

00:46:12.817 --> 00:46:14.977
<v Wes>A NAS vendor announces BcacheFS support?

00:46:15.977 --> 00:46:18.317
<v Chris>I think that would be the way I'd go because it's still kind of a long shot.

00:46:20.497 --> 00:46:21.057
<v Wes>I'm down.

00:46:22.197 --> 00:46:25.317
<v Brent>Next week, Wes gets hired by a NASDA company.

00:46:25.737 --> 00:46:26.357
<v Chris>I hope you're right.

00:46:27.277 --> 00:46:28.677
<v Drew>Supported Bcash FS support?

00:46:29.077 --> 00:46:29.437
<v Wes>Okay.

00:46:29.817 --> 00:46:33.657
<v Drew>Does that make sense? Like, it's an official part of it. It's not like an extension.

00:46:33.657 --> 00:46:34.537
<v Wes>Yeah, it's not a janky.

00:46:35.357 --> 00:46:38.797
<v Drew>It's an officially supported Bcash FS option.

00:46:39.017 --> 00:46:42.137
<v Chris>Right. It's not like some vendor, or it's not like some community mod or something.

00:46:42.417 --> 00:46:42.737
<v Drew>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:46:42.817 --> 00:46:45.097
<v Chris>Okay. All right, Wes Payne, lock it in.

00:46:45.097 --> 00:46:53.997
<v Wes>I predict that in 2026, a NAS vendor announces official eCacheFS support.

00:46:55.904 --> 00:46:57.524
<v Chris>I hope you are right about that one.

00:46:57.524 --> 00:46:57.784
<v Brent>Wow.

00:46:57.784 --> 00:47:02.884
<v Chris>I really do. I really do. I like that a lot, Wes. That's a good, solid first one.

00:47:03.084 --> 00:47:06.564
<v Chris>It's a risky one, and if it wins, it's going to be such a payoff.

00:47:07.224 --> 00:47:08.624
<v Chris>All right. Do you have a second prediction?

00:47:08.744 --> 00:47:13.024
<v Wes>Yeah, all right. Here's a safe option. I predict that in... Sorry.

00:47:15.024 --> 00:47:20.384
<v Wes>I predict that in 2026, we will see Linux kernel version 7.

00:47:21.164 --> 00:47:24.684
<v Chris>Whoa! I didn't even think of that. I like that a lot.

00:47:24.684 --> 00:47:27.104
<v Brent>Wow, that's so nice and simple.

00:47:27.624 --> 00:47:28.704
<v Chris>Very easy to measure.

00:47:28.924 --> 00:47:29.064
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:47:29.564 --> 00:47:31.424
<v Chris>Can I ask you a couple of qualifying questions?

00:47:31.624 --> 00:47:31.964
<v Wes>Of course.

00:47:33.104 --> 00:47:34.784
<v Chris>Does a RC count?

00:47:34.944 --> 00:47:35.724
<v Drew>That was my question too.

00:47:35.724 --> 00:47:41.724
<v Chris>Does a beta count? Yeah. Okay, what do you think? So, because how are you defining 7.0 release?

00:47:41.864 --> 00:47:45.544
<v Chris>Is it stable or is the code out there and we could run it? Like where's the line?

00:47:45.544 --> 00:47:48.744
<v Brent>Is this like announced versus shipped? Is it you did pull in one of those again?

00:47:48.904 --> 00:47:55.704
<v Wes>We will see that the next version will be 7. so we'll have an announcement that 7 is the next.

00:47:56.464 --> 00:47:57.724
<v Chris>Okay that's.

00:47:57.724 --> 00:47:58.584
<v Brent>Sneaky that buys you.

00:47:58.584 --> 00:48:01.544
<v Chris>Like a couple weeks that seems probable actually that actually seems probable,

00:48:02.424 --> 00:48:06.844
<v Chris>I can't believe I didn't think of that damn it I wish I would have thought of

00:48:06.844 --> 00:48:11.764
<v Chris>that one alright Linux 7 announced is essentially what you're saying well.

00:48:11.764 --> 00:48:14.064
<v Brent>You said next version so it needs to be like.

00:48:15.064 --> 00:48:16.484
<v Wes>Well a version we will see.

00:48:16.484 --> 00:48:21.044
<v Chris>Right because 8 is going to be the actual next stable version right and seven

00:48:21.044 --> 00:48:22.824
<v Chris>would be a development series? Is that how they still do it?

00:48:22.884 --> 00:48:24.844
<v Wes>Well, because we're at six, 19.

00:48:24.944 --> 00:48:25.544
<v Chris>19, yeah.

00:48:25.804 --> 00:48:30.364
<v Wes>So I'm saying that in 2026, we will go into the seven series.

00:48:30.624 --> 00:48:33.044
<v Wes>We'll get out of the six series into the seven series. However,

00:48:33.104 --> 00:48:34.564
<v Wes>we will think that's best said.

00:48:34.904 --> 00:48:36.664
<v Chris>How about, what about something like, what do you think of this,

00:48:36.764 --> 00:48:41.384
<v Chris>Ref? Is something like in 2026, the next series of the kernel,

00:48:41.484 --> 00:48:44.244
<v Chris>the next major series of the kernel will be announced? Something like that?

00:48:44.544 --> 00:48:49.704
<v Drew>Well, no, it's got to include the seven. That's a pretty crucial part of it.

00:48:49.704 --> 00:48:53.864
<v Brent>And do they start on that development branch?

00:48:55.929 --> 00:48:56.849
<v Brent>Is that one way to measure it?

00:48:57.409 --> 00:48:58.409
<v Chris>Just announced. I think announced.

00:48:58.649 --> 00:48:58.669
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:48:59.489 --> 00:49:00.309
<v Chris>I think announced is...

00:49:00.309 --> 00:49:03.469
<v Drew>They announced they're bumping the major kernel version to 7.

00:49:04.489 --> 00:49:04.849
<v Brent>Okay.

00:49:05.029 --> 00:49:05.609
<v Drew>At that point in the future.

00:49:05.749 --> 00:49:08.749
<v Chris>Either that or they're taking this thing to like 30-something. You know, I don't know.

00:49:11.589 --> 00:49:15.629
<v Wes>Okay, how about... I predict that in 2026, the Linux kernel community will announce

00:49:15.629 --> 00:49:17.509
<v Wes>they are bumping the major version to 7.

00:49:17.929 --> 00:49:18.769
<v Chris>I think that works.

00:49:18.829 --> 00:49:19.489
<v Drew>Yeah, I'm cool with it.

00:49:20.109 --> 00:49:22.629
<v Chris>All right, Wes Payne. Lock it in.

00:49:23.929 --> 00:49:29.049
<v Wes>I predict that in 2026 the linux kernel community will announce they are bumping

00:49:29.049 --> 00:49:31.269
<v Wes>the major version to seven.

00:49:31.269 --> 00:49:36.469
<v Chris>All right there it is i like that.

00:49:36.469 --> 00:49:37.469
<v Wes>All right i wish.

00:49:37.469 --> 00:49:40.989
<v Chris>I would have stolen that one i wish i would have thought of that one you got a third one.

00:49:40.989 --> 00:49:45.569
<v Wes>For us some backups in the doc if you want to steal any of those thank you i

00:49:45.569 --> 00:49:51.869
<v Wes>do have a third one here um by the end of 2026 when we review predictions next year.

00:49:52.229 --> 00:49:57.289
<v Wes>It will have been at least a month since you, Christopher, hand edited,

00:49:57.629 --> 00:50:01.089
<v Wes>without LLM assistance, your main NixOS config.

00:50:01.529 --> 00:50:02.049
<v Chris>Whoa.

00:50:02.549 --> 00:50:05.269
<v Brent>I mean, that might be true for this year's predictions.

00:50:05.269 --> 00:50:06.029
<v Chris>How do we define main?

00:50:06.209 --> 00:50:07.749
<v Wes>Yeah, we could...

00:50:07.749 --> 00:50:10.509
<v Chris>Because I have, you know, my server config that I use.

00:50:10.629 --> 00:50:13.009
<v Wes>Yeah, we could probably switch that out.

00:50:13.289 --> 00:50:17.829
<v Chris>But the nut of what you're trying to get at here is that I'll have gone a month

00:50:17.829 --> 00:50:20.849
<v Chris>without having to have touched a config file because I'm telling the machine.

00:50:20.849 --> 00:50:22.329
<v Wes>Yeah, there we go. Maybe that's it. Okay, yeah.

00:50:24.202 --> 00:50:26.902
<v Chris>That's that's probable how.

00:50:26.902 --> 00:50:28.802
<v Brent>Much are you paying him for this one.

00:50:28.802 --> 00:50:32.902
<v Chris>I mean it's possible it is surprisingly possible actually because i've been

00:50:32.902 --> 00:50:35.982
<v Chris>i've been trying to push it as far as i can okay.

00:50:35.982 --> 00:50:40.802
<v Brent>I have a question like yeah go this assumes he's still using nixos at that point

00:50:40.802 --> 00:50:46.582
<v Brent>right yeah he's not using nixos then obviously he wouldn't have edited it right.

00:50:46.582 --> 00:50:52.362
<v Chris>I would say yeah i have used uh i have used it to um edit an ubuntu config file

00:50:52.362 --> 00:50:53.742
<v Chris>so if you just made a config file.

00:50:53.922 --> 00:50:58.222
<v Wes>Yeah, it'll have been at least a month since you've hand-edited without LLM

00:50:58.222 --> 00:51:01.122
<v Wes>assistance a Linux config file.

00:51:01.262 --> 00:51:02.382
<v Chris>That seems pretty good, ref, right?

00:51:02.622 --> 00:51:04.722
<v Drew>Yeah, so anything in .config.

00:51:06.302 --> 00:51:06.822
<v Chris>Etsy,

00:51:09.182 --> 00:51:15.222
<v Chris>Dockerfiles, Yeah, Dockerfiles, NixConfig, a lot of things, Wes,

00:51:15.422 --> 00:51:17.502
<v Chris>that just need a quick edit. That is spicy.

00:51:17.782 --> 00:51:21.342
<v Chris>Alright, lock it in. I'll be honest.

00:51:22.342 --> 00:51:26.942
<v Wes>I predicted that by the end of 2026 when we're reviewing these very predictions

00:51:26.942 --> 00:51:32.342
<v Wes>it will have been at least a month since chris hand edited by which i mean without

00:51:32.342 --> 00:51:38.582
<v Wes>llm assistance a configuration file like a linux config a docker config an open source app config.

00:51:40.752 --> 00:51:45.052
<v Chris>We shall see. All right, so I have too many predictions.

00:51:45.532 --> 00:51:52.092
<v Chris>I have to whittle this down a little bit, and I have to go with my winners and losers here.

00:51:52.732 --> 00:51:59.612
<v Chris>And I'm going to start with kind of, I think, maybe an aspirational prediction.

00:52:00.432 --> 00:52:07.532
<v Chris>And I think that in 2026, Fedora Atomic replaces Workstation as the recommended

00:52:07.532 --> 00:52:10.312
<v Chris>download when you go to the Fedora's download page.

00:52:10.992 --> 00:52:11.472
<v Brent>Wow.

00:52:12.212 --> 00:52:12.612
<v Chris>Yeah.

00:52:12.932 --> 00:52:15.152
<v Brent>What's this based on? What's the hunch here?

00:52:15.512 --> 00:52:21.992
<v Chris>Well, over 2025, the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee has been kind of

00:52:21.992 --> 00:52:27.532
<v Chris>moving towards making the image-based system the main stable Fedora.

00:52:27.732 --> 00:52:30.412
<v Wes>So it's not based on the Aurora install you're talking about wiping?

00:52:30.652 --> 00:52:33.692
<v Chris>Nope, nope, nope, nope. It's based on the three years of the steering committee

00:52:33.692 --> 00:52:35.392
<v Chris>slowly working towards this.

00:52:35.452 --> 00:52:39.812
<v Chris>And I have to imagine this could be the year we actually see their efforts come to fruition.

00:52:40.752 --> 00:52:44.972
<v Chris>So I think the way to verify this would be you'd see changes at GetFedora.org

00:52:44.972 --> 00:52:49.792
<v Chris>where essentially a Silverblue-based download would be the default.

00:52:49.972 --> 00:52:51.092
<v Chris>Silverblue Workstation, perhaps.

00:52:51.512 --> 00:52:54.212
<v Brent>So year of the Fedora Atomic Desktop is what you're saying.

00:52:54.212 --> 00:52:59.392
<v Wes>Okay, so when I go there now, I get Fedora Workstation, Fedora KDE Plasma Desktop, and Fedora Server.

00:52:59.632 --> 00:52:59.772
<v Chris>Yeah.

00:53:00.312 --> 00:53:03.112
<v Wes>Well, then there's also three more under that. So there's like a row of...

00:53:03.112 --> 00:53:04.252
<v Wes>Is it just offered there?

00:53:04.372 --> 00:53:09.692
<v Chris>The top ones. The premiered featured workstation gets replaced with the Silverblue Workstation.

00:53:10.752 --> 00:53:19.072
<v Drew>Okay. Yeah. Another, so there's also fedorproject.org slash spins is currently all standard spins.

00:53:19.392 --> 00:53:24.252
<v Drew>And then atomic dash desktops is a list of all their atomic stuff.

00:53:24.252 --> 00:53:29.592
<v Drew>So you could also say that those would swap where atomic desktops become spins

00:53:29.592 --> 00:53:35.092
<v Drew>and spins becomes legacy or something along those lines.

00:53:35.092 --> 00:53:40.192
<v Chris>The shorthand I was thinking of using for that is just, it becomes the recommended download.

00:53:40.272 --> 00:53:40.812
<v Drew>Yeah, yeah.

00:53:43.181 --> 00:53:47.821
<v Chris>Okay, so my lock-in would be Fedora Atomic replaces Workstation as the recommended

00:53:47.821 --> 00:53:50.701
<v Chris>download. Just sort of, you think that works? Does that work?

00:53:50.981 --> 00:53:54.721
<v Brent>As long as it's measurable, right? As long as we feel like there's a way that

00:53:54.721 --> 00:53:56.661
<v Brent>we can see that a switch has happened?

00:53:57.401 --> 00:53:59.801
<v Chris>Well, if they did make that switch, it would be huge news.

00:53:59.961 --> 00:54:00.361
<v Drew>It would.

00:54:00.661 --> 00:54:01.661
<v Brent>Okay, all right.

00:54:01.881 --> 00:54:02.921
<v Chris>It's kind of a long show.

00:54:02.941 --> 00:54:07.361
<v Drew>I think we do need to be a little bit more specific about what recommended means.

00:54:07.741 --> 00:54:10.541
<v Drew>Recommended as the default download of the ISO.

00:54:10.541 --> 00:54:11.941
<v Chris>On the primary download page.

00:54:11.941 --> 00:54:14.581
<v Drew>Yeah, something along those lines would make me happy.

00:54:15.281 --> 00:54:18.001
<v Chris>So Fedora Atomic replaces Workstation

00:54:18.001 --> 00:54:22.521
<v Chris>as the recommended download on the primary project download page.

00:54:22.661 --> 00:54:23.081
<v Drew>Works for me.

00:54:23.361 --> 00:54:25.821
<v Chris>And if it doesn't change there, then the prediction... Yeah.

00:54:26.001 --> 00:54:27.481
<v Chris>Okay. All right, I'll give that a shot.

00:54:27.881 --> 00:54:33.181
<v Chris>In 2026, Fedora Atomic will replace Workstation as the recommended download

00:54:33.181 --> 00:54:35.961
<v Chris>on the project's primary download page.

00:54:37.601 --> 00:54:45.861
<v Chris>We shall see. So that's one. Now, I got to pick one that I think is a real curveball here.

00:54:46.261 --> 00:54:48.941
<v Chris>And I don't think this one's going to be a winner. But if it is,

00:54:49.061 --> 00:54:52.041
<v Chris>I'm going to feel like Nostradamus over here.

00:54:52.221 --> 00:54:53.101
<v Brent>Not Nosferati.

00:54:54.261 --> 00:55:01.261
<v Chris>Here's what I'm thinking about going with. I think Framework might launch their own distro in 2026.

00:55:01.761 --> 00:55:06.021
<v Brent>Framework computers. I want to know more about what you think it'll look like.

00:55:06.021 --> 00:55:10.941
<v Chris>So I think in part, we have seen them finance multiple projects this year,

00:55:10.981 --> 00:55:17.921
<v Chris>and that could be a great way to lay a bit of goodwill before you announce your own thing.

00:55:18.641 --> 00:55:24.181
<v Chris>And what made me think about this is they kind of need a framework edition OS

00:55:24.181 --> 00:55:29.741
<v Chris>just so that way when they do new edge products like their Snapdragon X Elite

00:55:29.741 --> 00:55:31.961
<v Chris>laptop that we talked about in LEP 641,

00:55:32.912 --> 00:55:37.572
<v Chris>In LUP641, we talked about how the generic kernels weren't enough for this new

00:55:37.572 --> 00:55:40.312
<v Chris>hardware, and that's been a pain point for Framework.

00:55:40.472 --> 00:55:44.712
<v Chris>If they have, like, a Framework Lite edition ISO, it might not be,

00:55:44.832 --> 00:55:47.472
<v Chris>like, a full-blown distro, but it's, like, a slightly, you know,

00:55:47.492 --> 00:55:51.252
<v Chris>amended distro that you could just download from them, and you could,

00:55:51.492 --> 00:55:55.112
<v Chris>say, install on a RISC-V development system or on an ARM.

00:55:55.112 --> 00:55:59.012
<v Wes>Not saying for points or anything, but just I'm curious. Do you have any ideas

00:55:59.012 --> 00:56:03.012
<v Wes>what they, in this hypothetical world of yours, how are they building this district?

00:56:03.752 --> 00:56:05.792
<v Brent>Well, they would make it arch-based like everybody else is doing.

00:56:05.792 --> 00:56:10.932
<v Chris>I think so. Yeah. I mean, if I were, I'm not going to put this in the prediction,

00:56:11.072 --> 00:56:14.912
<v Chris>but I would think maybe they do a little contract with DHH's company.

00:56:15.472 --> 00:56:15.872
<v Brent>Wow.

00:56:15.872 --> 00:56:16.892
<v Chris>Do a little business contract.

00:56:17.132 --> 00:56:17.252
<v Brent>Wow.

00:56:17.252 --> 00:56:18.092
<v Chris>Something that has some terms.

00:56:18.552 --> 00:56:19.752
<v Wes>Now that's a prediction.

00:56:19.952 --> 00:56:20.212
<v Brent>Yeah.

00:56:20.212 --> 00:56:23.232
<v Chris>I know. That is a prediction. I don't want to be that.

00:56:23.732 --> 00:56:24.692
<v Drew>No. Yeah.

00:56:26.092 --> 00:56:29.412
<v Chris>Interesting it could just be a fedora spin at the end of the day and that would still count.

00:56:29.412 --> 00:56:30.872
<v Wes>Sure i mean.

00:56:30.872 --> 00:56:31.332
<v Chris>This is kind.

00:56:31.332 --> 00:56:35.812
<v Brent>Of what we saw so 776 do right is they saw that having an officially supported

00:56:35.812 --> 00:56:40.372
<v Brent>os was easier for their hardware support and all that stuff fascinating so.

00:56:40.372 --> 00:56:41.852
<v Drew>You're thinking like an omaframey.

00:56:41.852 --> 00:56:47.572
<v Chris>Yeah basically a framework distro light.

00:56:47.572 --> 00:56:49.812
<v Brent>Why light sorry why are you.

00:56:49.812 --> 00:56:53.272
<v Chris>Well because i don't i don't think it's going to be a massive departure right

00:56:53.272 --> 00:56:56.832
<v Chris>i don't think they're going to have a customly in-house built desktop environment.

00:56:57.752 --> 00:57:01.152
<v Chris>I wouldn't expect it to be, I mean, it could be, but I wouldn't necessarily

00:57:01.152 --> 00:57:06.192
<v Chris>expect it to be, say, like SteamOS where it's image-based and things like that. I'm picturing...

00:57:06.192 --> 00:57:08.732
<v Wes>But it's more than them installing Ubuntu and putting a wallpaper on it.

00:57:09.629 --> 00:57:12.329
<v Chris>It could be as little as that, or it could be more than that.

00:57:13.109 --> 00:57:17.129
<v Chris>Basically, the key is it enables their hardware to run out of the box.

00:57:17.129 --> 00:57:20.329
<v Chris>So you ship with a kernel that has the right drivers that are signed and so

00:57:20.329 --> 00:57:23.729
<v Chris>forth for that particular hardware. That's the nut of what they're trying to accomplish.

00:57:23.929 --> 00:57:27.109
<v Chris>You can put any distro you want on there that's supported if it has the upstream

00:57:27.109 --> 00:57:30.609
<v Chris>drivers. But the idea is you can buy it with something that works out of the

00:57:30.609 --> 00:57:31.609
<v Chris>box. It doesn't run Windows.

00:57:32.309 --> 00:57:34.249
<v Drew>Framework branded distribution.

00:57:34.649 --> 00:57:34.949
<v Brent>Yeah.

00:57:35.089 --> 00:57:36.549
<v Chris>Yeah, framework branded distribution.

00:57:36.769 --> 00:57:36.949
<v Wes>Okay.

00:57:37.069 --> 00:57:43.029
<v Chris>Yeah. Okay, so how about in 2026, Framework will announce a Framework-branded distribution.

00:57:43.569 --> 00:57:44.189
<v Drew>Yeah.

00:57:44.329 --> 00:57:44.669
<v Chris>Does that work?

00:57:44.829 --> 00:57:45.689
<v Drew>Works pretty good to me.

00:57:46.109 --> 00:57:53.629
<v Chris>Here I go, gentlemen. In 2026, Framework will announce a Framework-branded Linux distribution.

00:57:55.814 --> 00:57:57.034
<v Chris>Watch him do it with FreeBSD.

00:57:57.254 --> 00:58:00.214
<v Brent>I noticed you said announce there, not ship. Interesting. Yeah,

00:58:00.274 --> 00:58:01.774
<v Brent>well, things are hard. I'm seeing a trend here.

00:58:02.434 --> 00:58:05.894
<v Chris>Things are hard. This is where, okay, I could use your guys' input.

00:58:06.814 --> 00:58:08.994
<v Chris>I have a couple of extras to go with. Yeah, let's see what you got.

00:58:08.994 --> 00:58:10.134
<v Chris>I don't know which direction to go with.

00:58:10.494 --> 00:58:15.614
<v Chris>One prediction is that a distribution, a rolling distribution,

00:58:16.254 --> 00:58:20.414
<v Chris>will replace sudo with run zero from systemd.

00:58:21.054 --> 00:58:21.494
<v Wes>Okay.

00:58:21.974 --> 00:58:26.774
<v Chris>And then my other prediction, and this is a little spicy, kdelinux

00:58:26.774 --> 00:58:32.494
<v Chris>misses a 1.0 in 2026 and maintains in the you know beta and rc state building

00:58:32.494 --> 00:58:38.514
<v Chris>a distro is hard and the last 10 15 is the hardest and then and this is the

00:58:38.514 --> 00:58:42.054
<v Chris>one i think is my weakest prediction but i feel the most conviction about so

00:58:42.054 --> 00:58:44.514
<v Chris>i don't know how to square and.

00:58:44.514 --> 00:58:47.074
<v Brent>You should go with that one clearly yeah.

00:58:47.074 --> 00:58:47.934
<v Wes>I said second brent.

00:58:47.934 --> 00:58:54.774
<v Chris>Okay here's the prediction in 2026 refurb used and upgrade not replace becomes

00:58:54.774 --> 00:58:59.974
<v Chris>the top Homelab narrative showing up as a dominant theme across Linux and Homelab

00:58:59.974 --> 00:59:01.974
<v Chris>channels on Reddit and other communities.

00:59:02.154 --> 00:59:03.294
<v Wes>Oh yeah, I think that's a good one.

00:59:03.454 --> 00:59:05.914
<v Drew>That's a good one, but that's real hard to prove.

00:59:05.934 --> 00:59:07.454
<v Brent>That's going to be true, but impossible to measure.

00:59:07.594 --> 00:59:12.834
<v Chris>Yeah, I know. Well, so I figured the way you'd measure it is there'd be a couple

00:59:12.834 --> 00:59:14.314
<v Chris>of scoreable success criteria.

00:59:14.514 --> 00:59:18.294
<v Chris>You'd have to look at our Homelab and our self-hosted and our Linux and see

00:59:18.294 --> 00:59:21.694
<v Chris>how often keywords like refurb, used, e-waste, old hardware,

00:59:21.874 --> 00:59:26.194
<v Chris>upgrade, DDR4, DDR5, SAS, enterprise surplus were used.

00:59:26.754 --> 00:59:32.614
<v Chris>Maybe two major outlets like Serve the Home, Level 1 Techs, Pharonix, the LWN.

00:59:32.854 --> 00:59:38.394
<v Chris>They have articles or videos explaining, you know, centered around surplus, refurb hardware.

00:59:39.114 --> 00:59:42.134
<v Chris>And this probably doesn't count, but I would also imagine it becomes a topic

00:59:42.134 --> 00:59:44.574
<v Chris>on this show too. It'll become a topic throughout the show.

00:59:44.834 --> 00:59:45.634
<v Brent>Isn't it already?

00:59:45.734 --> 00:59:51.034
<v Chris>Because, well, I mean, it's already so bad. And with the RAM and...

00:59:51.759 --> 00:59:56.999
<v Chris>and the disk prices and GPU prices already crazy, I really think it's going

00:59:56.999 --> 01:00:00.979
<v Chris>to be a year about getting every inch out of the hardware you already have.

01:00:01.239 --> 01:00:07.419
<v Chris>And honestly, there is room. Stock distributions have room for improvements. We've played with this.

01:00:07.539 --> 01:00:11.359
<v Chris>And you can get better performance if you are willing to dig into it.

01:00:11.479 --> 01:00:17.119
<v Chris>So I think that type of system optimization and reusing hardware is going to

01:00:17.119 --> 01:00:18.819
<v Chris>be a major trend for 2026.

01:00:19.119 --> 01:00:21.499
<v Drew>Okay. So here's the way I see it.

01:00:21.499 --> 01:00:23.279
<v Chris>Do you like that one more than the KDE Linux one?

01:00:24.379 --> 01:00:27.139
<v Drew>I do. I think it's a more interesting prediction.

01:00:27.459 --> 01:00:27.779
<v Chris>Okay.

01:00:27.959 --> 01:00:31.619
<v Drew>I also think it's the one that's going to piss you off the most when you actually

01:00:31.619 --> 01:00:33.519
<v Drew>have to go and collect the statistics.

01:00:34.619 --> 01:00:34.939
<v Brent>100%.

01:00:35.799 --> 01:00:37.139
<v Chris>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

01:00:37.199 --> 01:00:38.119
<v Drew>It's your funeral.

01:00:39.879 --> 01:00:42.679
<v Chris>Yeah, if I could think of a really good way to measure it, I would feel better about it.

01:00:43.079 --> 01:00:44.999
<v Brent>But also, who's going to verify your measurements?

01:00:46.119 --> 01:00:46.439
<v Drew>Yeah.

01:00:46.679 --> 01:00:49.499
<v Chris>Well, no, I think, no, it would have to be like, it would have to be.

01:00:49.999 --> 01:00:51.279
<v Wes>Submit the code for review.

01:00:51.499 --> 01:00:51.759
<v Brent>Yeah.

01:00:52.899 --> 01:00:56.819
<v Wes>Ideally, should we build stats, start building stats now to see what the baseline is?

01:00:56.819 --> 01:00:56.899
<v Drew>Right.

01:00:57.679 --> 01:01:00.859
<v Chris>Yeah, you'd have to be based on, like, coverage, community discussions.

01:01:01.339 --> 01:01:02.919
<v Drew>You got to bring your homework. Podcasts and YouTube videos.

01:01:03.079 --> 01:01:06.059
<v Drew>Is the thing. When you go to prove this out.

01:01:06.999 --> 01:01:10.199
<v Brent>You could do it another way. You could say, like...

01:01:10.935 --> 01:01:16.395
<v Brent>the trend becomes so powerful that like there's a new pod, three new podcasts

01:01:16.395 --> 01:01:21.795
<v Brent>that start specifically angling that or like an, you know, 10 new YouTube channels

01:01:21.795 --> 01:01:24.215
<v Brent>are specifically about refurbing or something like that.

01:01:24.475 --> 01:01:25.615
<v Wes>My old home lab.

01:01:25.875 --> 01:01:30.975
<v Chris>This old home lab. That's less. You should have sent that URL. That's good.

01:01:32.335 --> 01:01:35.835
<v Drew>Micro center has a, a used home lab.

01:01:36.575 --> 01:01:38.155
<v Brent>There you go. There you go.

01:01:38.955 --> 01:01:41.735
<v Chris>Honestly i want to do a this old home lab segment where we go

01:01:41.735 --> 01:01:44.815
<v Chris>out and we refurb on listeners home labs so i

01:01:44.815 --> 01:01:47.995
<v Chris>want to do that i mean this is to me seems

01:01:47.995 --> 01:01:52.095
<v Chris>like it's at least going to be a strong narrative for most of the year if it

01:01:52.095 --> 01:01:56.495
<v Chris>dominates 2026 is yet to be seen but like drew if your prediction plays out

01:01:56.495 --> 01:02:02.395
<v Chris>where nvidia pulls out of the consumer market and if the uh who was it also

01:02:02.395 --> 01:02:05.275
<v Chris>was just announced that they might be leaving the consumer market just just

01:02:05.275 --> 01:02:06.935
<v Chris>yesterday or the day before on Friday.

01:02:07.815 --> 01:02:10.395
<v Chris>Another company announced that they're probably pulling out of the consumer

01:02:10.395 --> 01:02:12.695
<v Chris>market. It's getting rough out there.

01:02:13.555 --> 01:02:17.995
<v Chris>So, yeah, the measuring it, the proof is going to be to measuring it at the time.

01:02:19.195 --> 01:02:24.755
<v Chris>And I guess if we said two major outlets, so if I said something like two major

01:02:24.755 --> 01:02:33.595
<v Chris>outlets on YouTube and in writing and dominant themes on our home lab self-hosted in our Linux.

01:02:33.595 --> 01:02:38.695
<v Brent>Is that the dominant themes is hard to measure right yeah.

01:02:38.695 --> 01:02:39.595
<v Chris>It is mm-hmm,

01:02:41.365 --> 01:02:42.565
<v Chris>But probably achievable.

01:02:43.365 --> 01:02:47.505
<v Brent>Well, you could sort the posts for the year, and if the top five,

01:02:48.245 --> 01:02:52.185
<v Brent>I don't know, 50% of the top 10 posts are about it.

01:02:52.185 --> 01:02:54.765
<v Chris>I don't know if it'll materialize like that or if it would just be a lot of chatter.

01:02:55.205 --> 01:02:57.885
<v Brent>Well, you got to measure this thing.

01:02:58.045 --> 01:02:58.245
<v Drew>Yeah.

01:02:58.825 --> 01:03:02.745
<v Brent>It's a good prediction, but it's nebulous.

01:03:03.545 --> 01:03:10.165
<v Chris>Primary verification signal to me seems like news coverage and just frequency

01:03:10.165 --> 01:03:14.245
<v Chris>of YouTube videos, subreddit posts podcasts like if like if you know at the

01:03:14.245 --> 01:03:16.765
<v Chris>end of the year if we can measure that somehow all.

01:03:16.765 --> 01:03:22.945
<v Drew>Right look if i'm judging again when you go to prove this out there had better

01:03:22.945 --> 01:03:26.965
<v Drew>be a pepe sylvia style board behind.

01:03:26.965 --> 01:03:28.425
<v Chris>You yeah.

01:03:28.425 --> 01:03:31.905
<v Wes>There we go build the board prove it out yeah and i.

01:03:31.905 --> 01:03:33.285
<v Chris>Recommend working.

01:03:33.285 --> 01:03:34.505
<v Drew>On this thing through the year.

01:03:34.505 --> 01:03:37.965
<v Chris>I mean maybe i shouldn't go with this one because like the KDE Linux doesn't

01:03:37.965 --> 01:03:41.925
<v Chris>hit 1.0 would be easy to measure, or say Tumbleweeder Arch switching to run zero.

01:03:41.925 --> 01:03:43.545
<v Brent>But it's quite plain as a prediction.

01:03:43.785 --> 01:03:47.285
<v Chris>I'll give it a go, and if I can't argue my case, I'll have to take the L next

01:03:47.285 --> 01:03:50.165
<v Chris>year. Probably going to hate that I did this, but I could do it.

01:03:50.225 --> 01:03:56.105
<v Brent>What about like a well-established podcast takes it up as a topic that they

01:03:56.105 --> 01:03:59.045
<v Brent>would have never done in the past? Because it's like...

01:03:59.425 --> 01:04:01.125
<v Chris>I just don't know if I'd notice that.

01:04:01.625 --> 01:04:02.885
<v Brent>Well, that's up to you, man.

01:04:04.325 --> 01:04:06.825
<v Chris>Can you imagine me spending my entire year You're scouring the web.

01:04:07.525 --> 01:04:08.645
<v Brent>Isn't that what you do anyway?

01:04:09.665 --> 01:04:10.745
<v Chris>I must be right.

01:04:12.926 --> 01:04:14.506
<v Brent>If you can measure it, I think it's a good one.

01:04:14.586 --> 01:04:19.386
<v Drew>Yeah, it's a really good one. I like it. But, yeah, you've got to put in the legwork.

01:04:19.486 --> 01:04:24.826
<v Chris>Okay, how about reused, refurb, upgrade, not replace, becomes a top homelab

01:04:24.826 --> 01:04:32.066
<v Chris>narrative showing up as a dominant theme across YouTube, Reddit, and news outlets.

01:04:33.166 --> 01:04:37.046
<v Chris>Not a dominant theme across news outlets, but showing how about as a reoccurring theme.

01:04:37.766 --> 01:04:41.526
<v Chris>I don't know if that's also very – See, this sucks, you guys. This one sucks.

01:04:41.866 --> 01:04:42.086
<v Drew>It's tricky.

01:04:43.066 --> 01:04:44.326
<v Wes>How bad do you want it?

01:04:44.366 --> 01:04:48.326
<v Drew>Recurring theme isn't terrible. It could probably be improved.

01:04:48.566 --> 01:04:49.346
<v Chris>Come on, chat room.

01:04:49.966 --> 01:04:52.786
<v Brent>How do you yes or no the prediction? That's the real question.

01:04:52.906 --> 01:04:54.646
<v Brent>What's the tip over point?

01:04:55.126 --> 01:04:57.026
<v Chris>What about Google Trend words?

01:04:57.666 --> 01:04:58.006
<v Brent>Oh.

01:04:58.346 --> 01:04:59.166
<v Drew>Ah, yeah, okay.

01:04:59.966 --> 01:05:01.486
<v Chris>So as measured by Google Trends?

01:05:02.675 --> 01:05:04.555
<v Wes>Yeah, but would you define a set of...

01:05:04.555 --> 01:05:05.575
<v Brent>You have to take a base for it.

01:05:05.575 --> 01:05:05.675
<v Chris>Yeah.

01:05:05.775 --> 01:05:06.315
<v Wes>...thing you plug in.

01:05:06.495 --> 01:05:11.095
<v Chris>Yeah. I have them here in the doc. Refurb, used, e-waste, old hardware,

01:05:11.255 --> 01:05:16.815
<v Chris>upgrade, DDR4, DDR5, SAS, enterprise surplus, those types of things.

01:05:17.555 --> 01:05:19.475
<v Drew>If they trend strongly upwards.

01:05:20.135 --> 01:05:27.555
<v Chris>Yeah, okay. In 2026, refurb, used, upgrade, not replace, terms that get the

01:05:27.555 --> 01:05:32.415
<v Chris>most out of old hardware will see an uptick on Google Trends. That's pretty...

01:05:33.995 --> 01:05:37.755
<v Chris>we gotta move on so I'm gonna lock it in even though it's crap no I think that's

01:05:37.755 --> 01:05:40.935
<v Chris>okay it is okay we'll argue it next.

01:05:40.935 --> 01:05:43.975
<v Wes>Year it's fine see the terms say see the terms in the doc yeah.

01:05:43.975 --> 01:05:52.335
<v Chris>Yeah terms of fable in show doc there you go I love that alright okay okay I'm gonna try this,

01:05:53.315 --> 01:06:00.335
<v Chris>in 2026 refurb used upgrade not replace these types of topics become a top narrative

01:06:00.335 --> 01:06:06.295
<v Chris>on Homelab subreddits YouTube and news outlets and I will have terms in the

01:06:06.295 --> 01:06:10.835
<v Chris>doc that can be used for Google trend searches and others good enough,

01:06:11.955 --> 01:06:16.015
<v Chris>not great but I like the sentiment because it just feels like and I think it's

01:06:16.015 --> 01:06:21.115
<v Chris>an area where Linux is kind of super positioned to do really well it's a sucky

01:06:21.115 --> 01:06:25.235
<v Chris>position for us all to be in but this is like our moment to shine too so the

01:06:25.235 --> 01:06:26.915
<v Chris>Linux wave continues that's strange our.

01:06:26.915 --> 01:06:29.455
<v Brent>Show doc just changed with new tags in it.

01:06:30.255 --> 01:06:30.955
<v Chris>Yeah it seems.

01:06:30.955 --> 01:06:32.575
<v Wes>To be dynamically updating throughout the year.

01:06:38.507 --> 01:06:42.247
<v Chris>Join crowd health dot com and use the promo code unplugged.

01:06:42.327 --> 01:06:47.607
<v Chris>The clock is ticking and these are hard decisions that need to be made. It's enrollment time.

01:06:47.827 --> 01:06:51.307
<v Chris>The season where the health insurance companies hope you're just going to sign up and pay for more.

01:06:51.507 --> 01:06:54.547
<v Chris>It's expensive every single year. And then when you really need it,

01:06:54.647 --> 01:06:58.307
<v Chris>it's awful. And if you're a small business owner, well, the story is just a

01:06:58.307 --> 01:06:59.387
<v Chris>nightmare here in the States.

01:06:59.567 --> 01:07:03.367
<v Chris>You should really go check out crowd health. Join crowd health dot com and use

01:07:03.367 --> 01:07:07.427
<v Chris>the promo code unplugged. CrowdHealth is a community of people that fund each

01:07:07.427 --> 01:07:08.567
<v Chris>other's medical bills directly.

01:07:08.787 --> 01:07:12.307
<v Chris>No middleman, no networks, no nonsense.

01:07:12.507 --> 01:07:17.627
<v Chris>It's stress-free. I've been a member for over three years, and I've saved thousands

01:07:17.627 --> 01:07:19.367
<v Chris>of dollars. My wife's a member, too.

01:07:19.967 --> 01:07:23.927
<v Chris>You can get health care for under $100. You get access to a team of health bill

01:07:23.927 --> 01:07:27.847
<v Chris>negotiators, access to low-cost prescriptions, lab testing tools.

01:07:27.987 --> 01:07:28.787
<v Chris>Man, has that been handy.

01:07:29.107 --> 01:07:32.927
<v Chris>As well as a database of low-cost, high-quality doctors that have been vetted

01:07:32.927 --> 01:07:35.287
<v Chris>by CrowdHealth. And they've been around for a minute now.

01:07:35.487 --> 01:07:38.447
<v Chris>I mean, I've been a member for over three years, and they were around before I started.

01:07:38.667 --> 01:07:42.747
<v Chris>But they've been really refining that app, giving you access to all of this in just seconds.

01:07:42.947 --> 01:07:46.027
<v Chris>It really is a nice way to go. And when something major happens,

01:07:46.207 --> 01:07:50.347
<v Chris>you pay the first $500, and then the crowd steps in and helps you fund the rest.

01:07:50.907 --> 01:07:55.087
<v Chris>It's really the way things should be working, and it's a great option for a

01:07:55.087 --> 01:07:58.427
<v Chris>lot of us. But I think, don't take my word for it, you should go check it out yourself.

01:07:58.607 --> 01:08:02.947
<v Chris>Go to joincrowdhealth.com, and if you sign up, use the promo code UNPLUGGED.

01:08:02.947 --> 01:08:07.987
<v Chris>You become part of the crowd who want to help pay for each other's bills and

01:08:07.987 --> 01:08:09.167
<v Chris>save money on insurance.

01:08:09.407 --> 01:08:12.787
<v Chris>I mean, it's it really doesn't need to be so expensive. And the system,

01:08:12.927 --> 01:08:15.907
<v Chris>the system is so broken. They're just they're betting your stay in it.

01:08:16.307 --> 01:08:18.627
<v Chris>And I opted out several years ago.

01:08:19.544 --> 01:08:23.784
<v Chris>You can too. So go check it out. CrowdHealth members have saved over $40 million

01:08:23.784 --> 01:08:26.784
<v Chris>in health expenses because they refuse to overpay for health care.

01:08:26.944 --> 01:08:30.764
<v Chris>It is open enrollment season, so go take your power back. So go join CrowdHealth

01:08:30.764 --> 01:08:34.564
<v Chris>at joincrowdhealth.com, and you'll get started when you use our promo code UNPLUGGED,

01:08:34.584 --> 01:08:38.824
<v Chris>$99 for your first three months. It really is awesome.

01:08:39.964 --> 01:08:44.164
<v Chris>Joincrowdhealth.com, and that's promo code UNPLUGGED. CrowdHealth isn't insurance.

01:08:44.164 --> 01:08:46.244
<v Chris>You can opt out. You can take your power back.

01:08:46.444 --> 01:08:52.224
<v Chris>This is how we make a difference. Join crowdhealth.com, promo code unplugged. Join me in the crowd.

01:08:52.784 --> 01:08:55.504
<v Chris>Join crowdhealth.com, promo code unplugged.

01:08:57.876 --> 01:09:04.296
<v Chris>Unraid.net slash unplugged. Unleash your hardware and start 2026 off right by

01:09:04.296 --> 01:09:06.376
<v Chris>reducing your dependency on the cloud.

01:09:06.556 --> 01:09:09.836
<v Chris>Go build the system you have right now or your dream server.

01:09:10.016 --> 01:09:11.136
<v Chris>Unraid will grow with you.

01:09:11.536 --> 01:09:14.676
<v Chris>Unraid.net slash unplugged to get you started. 30-day free trial.

01:09:14.876 --> 01:09:18.136
<v Chris>It's really something. And recently 7.2 came out.

01:09:18.256 --> 01:09:21.356
<v Chris>There has been some incredible improvements in there, really nice improvements

01:09:21.356 --> 01:09:24.216
<v Chris>to the web UI to make it responsive so you can work on your couch,

01:09:24.216 --> 01:09:27.896
<v Chris>on your mobile device, which, come on, that's actually really great.

01:09:27.996 --> 01:09:29.496
<v Chris>You're sitting there watching kind of a low-key show.

01:09:29.636 --> 01:09:33.036
<v Chris>You can sit there and poke on your home NAS, right, install a new application.

01:09:33.556 --> 01:09:37.276
<v Chris>And with the Unraid API available now, there's some really cool,

01:09:37.436 --> 01:09:41.696
<v Chris>powerful applications and dashboards being built, and they've expanded their ZFS support.

01:09:41.836 --> 01:09:46.036
<v Chris>They have NTFS support now for Grampus Photos, and the really great thing is

01:09:46.036 --> 01:09:48.016
<v Chris>the growing community app repository.

01:09:48.416 --> 01:09:51.196
<v Chris>I don't think there's been an application we've talked about on the show yet

01:09:51.196 --> 01:09:54.116
<v Chris>that isn't just essentially a click away on an

01:09:54.116 --> 01:09:56.816
<v Chris>unraid system and they have different versions depending on your

01:09:56.816 --> 01:09:59.956
<v Chris>hardware so if you have an all intel system well they'll

01:09:59.956 --> 01:10:02.816
<v Chris>have builds optimized for that or if you have an nvidia or

01:10:02.816 --> 01:10:06.136
<v Chris>amd etc etc you'll find community versions of some of these apps where it really

01:10:06.136 --> 01:10:09.796
<v Chris>matters they'll they'll special optimize them for your different gpus meaning

01:10:09.796 --> 01:10:13.716
<v Chris>it's a one click install to get something that's optimized for your particular

01:10:13.716 --> 01:10:18.736
<v Chris>hardware be it with gpu or without and that's just kind of a taste it's really

01:10:18.736 --> 01:10:22.136
<v Chris>it's such a powerful aspect to unraid is those community applications.

01:10:22.456 --> 01:10:27.896
<v Chris>And now, really, that new responsive web and that API. You bring it all together.

01:10:28.296 --> 01:10:31.236
<v Chris>Unraid's built on top of a modern Linux system that they've been maintaining

01:10:31.236 --> 01:10:34.716
<v Chris>now for over 20 years, and they're going strong from strength to strength.

01:10:34.936 --> 01:10:39.636
<v Chris>It's so great, and I think you're going to love it, especially for those of you that have a weekend.

01:10:39.976 --> 01:10:43.416
<v Chris>You've got some hardware in your closet right now. You want to try a project.

01:10:44.416 --> 01:10:47.776
<v Chris>Unraid.net slash unplugged. You get started right away and you get going.

01:10:47.956 --> 01:10:51.656
<v Chris>Check it out. Support the show. Unraid.net slash unplugged.

01:10:54.908 --> 01:10:57.848
<v Brent>Well, happy holidays, everybody. As we're nearing the end of the year,

01:10:58.028 --> 01:11:01.068
<v Brent>we have some baller boosters this week.

01:11:01.808 --> 01:11:05.628
<v Brent>A baller booster of baller boosters. Chris, you want to take this one?

01:11:05.708 --> 01:11:09.128
<v Brent>You saw it come in and you kind of like lost your cool.

01:11:09.828 --> 01:11:12.708
<v Chris>Well, Optic Gray is our baller booster.

01:11:16.308 --> 01:11:23.288
<v Chris>And get ready for this, gentlemen. Brace yourselves. 1.5 million Satoshis.

01:11:23.948 --> 01:11:25.108
<v Brent>Oh, wow.

01:11:29.008 --> 01:11:29.028
<v Wes>I...

01:11:40.024 --> 01:11:41.344
<v Chris>It's absolutely amazing.

01:11:41.524 --> 01:11:43.184
<v Wes>I don't think baller is the right word anymore.

01:11:43.404 --> 01:11:46.344
<v Chris>No, no. Hello, Chris, Brenton, and Wes.

01:11:46.524 --> 01:11:49.644
<v Chris>Happy holidays. I don't know if you remember, but I wanted to reminisce about

01:11:49.644 --> 01:11:53.064
<v Chris>a trip I made back in 2019 to the Texas cyberside.

01:11:53.304 --> 01:11:53.324
<v Wes>Oh.

01:11:55.164 --> 01:11:59.044
<v Chris>The conference itself was meh. Yep.

01:11:59.604 --> 01:12:03.124
<v Chris>But it was completely overshadowed by the evening I got to spend with you two.

01:12:03.364 --> 01:12:06.684
<v Chris>Carl, special thanks for paying chauffeur and cheese and a bunch of other JB

01:12:06.684 --> 01:12:09.224
<v Chris>fans while gallivanting around San Antonio.

01:12:09.864 --> 01:12:13.004
<v Chris>The night remains one of my most cherished memories, and I'm still incredibly

01:12:13.004 --> 01:12:15.384
<v Chris>thankful to all of you for being so gracious.

01:12:16.024 --> 01:12:19.284
<v Chris>Wow. Well, thank you, Optic. That's amazing.

01:12:19.664 --> 01:12:21.624
<v Chris>And he said that in where he had some trouble with Fountain,

01:12:21.644 --> 01:12:24.904
<v Chris>he was persistent and kept going anyways. We really appreciate that.

01:12:25.804 --> 01:12:30.484
<v Chris>And I would say it was that evening that was the singular highlight of our trip.

01:12:30.704 --> 01:12:31.584
<v Wes>Yes, definitely.

01:12:31.944 --> 01:12:32.184
<v Chris>Yeah.

01:12:32.384 --> 01:12:36.484
<v Wes>We'll have to run into another, some kind of event, hopefully a better event, but some kind of event.

01:12:36.644 --> 01:12:42.344
<v Chris>Yeah. Hopefully we'll be down in Texas next year. That's my prediction. We go to Texas in 2026.

01:12:42.964 --> 01:12:43.964
<v Brent>It's a good one.

01:12:44.124 --> 01:12:45.804
<v Chris>Hopefully we'll see you there. Thank you for that baller boost.

01:12:45.964 --> 01:12:50.824
<v Chris>We tremendously appreciate it. Fantastic way to wrap up the year and kick off the new year.

01:12:52.604 --> 01:12:56.844
<v Chris>The Dude Abides comes in with 247,000 Satoshis.

01:12:57.744 --> 01:12:58.184
<v Brent>Wow.

01:13:05.234 --> 01:13:08.514
<v Chris>247. Sounds great number. The dude abides writes, hey, alas,

01:13:08.634 --> 01:13:10.134
<v Chris>boost of the year. I finally caught up.

01:13:10.274 --> 01:13:13.874
<v Chris>I always like to listen to the full members episode, so it takes some time.

01:13:14.094 --> 01:13:16.394
<v Chris>I enjoyed the last episode with Kent and Carl.

01:13:16.754 --> 01:13:19.194
<v Chris>Keep them coming. Also, thanks for the IPTV suggestions.

01:13:19.714 --> 01:13:23.394
<v Chris>I almost had no idea this existed. I managed to submit my home lab in time,

01:13:23.494 --> 01:13:26.354
<v Chris>so I'm excited to listen to this episode, although not sure if I'll catch it live.

01:13:26.994 --> 01:13:29.494
<v Chris>But it would be fun to have Alex on the show to roast our setups.

01:13:29.634 --> 01:13:31.594
<v Chris>Oh, that would be a great addition.

01:13:31.914 --> 01:13:32.274
<v Drew>That would be good.

01:13:32.434 --> 01:13:35.714
<v Chris>That would be a great addition to next year, wouldn't it? We should consider that.

01:13:36.834 --> 01:13:40.734
<v Chris>Thanks for the holidays, gents, and the company. Well, thank you, the dude abides.

01:13:41.214 --> 01:13:41.694
<v Wes>Keep abiding.

01:13:42.074 --> 01:13:43.014
<v Chris>We really appreciate that.

01:13:43.254 --> 01:13:45.894
<v Brent>Do we have to redo the boosties because of these two boosts?

01:13:46.094 --> 01:13:52.474
<v Chris>I know, right? Also, we should mention, these are not even all of the boosts

01:13:52.474 --> 01:13:54.314
<v Chris>because we're a little out of time.

01:13:54.514 --> 01:13:57.914
<v Chris>We're going to do another batch in the next episode. So if you do not hear your

01:13:57.914 --> 01:14:02.354
<v Chris>boost read this episode, we have it banked and it'll be in next episode.

01:14:02.354 --> 01:14:03.934
<v Chris>So thank you very, very much for sending it in.

01:14:04.214 --> 01:14:07.534
<v Chris>Just for time, we're doubling them up and also because of the recording schedule.

01:14:09.134 --> 01:14:13.514
<v Wes>Nostromo boosts in with 37,879 sats.

01:14:13.754 --> 01:14:14.154
<v Chris>I like that.

01:14:17.281 --> 01:14:22.201
<v Wes>Thank you for another year of great entertainment, and happy new year to all of you.

01:14:22.361 --> 01:14:26.661
<v Chris>Happy new year to you. Thank you very much, Nostro. Appreciate that.

01:14:26.881 --> 01:14:28.521
<v Chris>Appreciate that value, too. It's good to hear from you.

01:14:28.641 --> 01:14:33.801
<v Wes>I'll take Amunday here, too. Amunday Boosin with 24,444 sats.

01:14:34.761 --> 01:14:35.661
<v Chris>Not too bad.

01:14:36.121 --> 01:14:41.621
<v Wes>Ah, and answering a question. Yes, Signal is still absolutely the best secure messenger.

01:14:41.781 --> 01:14:45.361
<v Wes>Or maybe MOLLE, which is just an alternate but compatible version of the Signal

01:14:45.361 --> 01:14:50.161
<v Wes>client with a handful of security improvements and optional settings made mandatory.

01:14:50.621 --> 01:14:54.001
<v Wes>There's periodically FUD varying ridiculousness around Signal,

01:14:54.081 --> 01:14:55.281
<v Wes>but it carries on through the noise.

01:14:55.701 --> 01:14:58.901
<v Wes>I'm continually impressed by how everything Signal does is from an explicitly

01:14:58.901 --> 01:15:00.061
<v Wes>security-first position.

01:15:00.281 --> 01:15:06.121
<v Wes>The one maybe legitimate criticism of it was that it used to require a... Oh, that got cut off.

01:15:06.441 --> 01:15:06.881
<v Chris>Oh!

01:15:07.701 --> 01:15:08.901
<v Brent>I believe it's...

01:15:08.901 --> 01:15:09.321
<v Chris>Phone number.

01:15:09.721 --> 01:15:10.021
<v Wes>Yeah, exactly.

01:15:10.381 --> 01:15:12.181
<v Brent>But that was recently addressed.

01:15:12.761 --> 01:15:13.281
<v Chris>Yeah, yeah.

01:15:13.281 --> 01:15:19.101
<v Wes>Also, Amadei here wanted to say that they really enjoyed the conversation with Kent.

01:15:20.261 --> 01:15:22.441
<v Wes>So we've seen more continued support there.

01:15:22.601 --> 01:15:25.461
<v Chris>We really do appreciate that signal. You don't have to send us a huge boost,

01:15:25.561 --> 01:15:30.861
<v Chris>but that is a big signal for us to continue that kind of stuff. That's a great boost.

01:15:31.461 --> 01:15:33.381
<v Chris>Really nice. Thank you, Amadei. Appreciate that.

01:15:34.241 --> 01:15:39.421
<v Brent>Well, Johnny Castaway sends in 19,045 sats under two boosts.

01:15:39.541 --> 01:15:44.121
<v Brent>boosts and one of those boosts is a one two three four five satoshi boost oh.

01:15:44.121 --> 01:15:47.001
<v Chris>Sneaking in there well let's give them a little let's give them some fruit loops

01:15:47.001 --> 01:15:58.861
<v Chris>which everybody loves thank you very much and of course a little space balls nicely done.

01:15:58.861 --> 01:16:03.381
<v Brent>The johnny here is a long time listener and jupiter signal member just saying

01:16:03.381 --> 01:16:08.801
<v Brent>hello from the south coast of england that's in devon uk oh hello Oh.

01:16:10.319 --> 01:16:11.799
<v Wes>Thanks for sending the letter all this way.

01:16:12.259 --> 01:16:17.039
<v Brent>I've just upped my Knicks game and now running Knicks Flakes with BcashFS,

01:16:17.399 --> 01:16:22.239
<v Brent>ZSwap, FBE, Plymouth, Gnome, and Neary desktops.

01:16:22.979 --> 01:16:27.799
<v Brent>Oh, by the way, some little tail scale with a work in progress to give Nebula a try.

01:16:28.419 --> 01:16:33.199
<v Brent>I'm off to Fosdom early next year, my first Linux expo, and very excited.

01:16:33.659 --> 01:16:37.499
<v Brent>And have some mince pies on me with some Santa sets.

01:16:38.139 --> 01:16:40.679
<v Chris>Thank you very much. You ever had mince pie with?

01:16:40.979 --> 01:16:42.559
<v Wes>No, but I think we got to go get some.

01:16:42.719 --> 01:16:47.519
<v Chris>I think so. Also, if you are interested, and this goes out to everyone too,

01:16:47.739 --> 01:16:51.919
<v Chris>but especially to you, Johnny, if you would like to send us a Fosdom report,

01:16:52.159 --> 01:16:56.179
<v Chris>especially from a perspective of a new person, we would very much love to read those on the show.

01:16:56.999 --> 01:16:59.559
<v Chris>That would be a good signal. If you're interested.

01:16:59.779 --> 01:17:00.239
<v Wes>Good idea.

01:17:01.099 --> 01:17:04.039
<v Brent>Johnny continues here with the second boost. Just wanted to say I enjoyed the

01:17:04.039 --> 01:17:08.979
<v Brent>show on Bcash FS. amazing work by Kent and the JB crew for the great content.

01:17:09.179 --> 01:17:12.919
<v Brent>As always, this gave me the extra motivation I needed to switch up my daily

01:17:12.919 --> 01:17:20.079
<v Brent>driver, a Nix OS T460P ThinkPad with Bcache FS, Cache OS kernel using my favorite

01:17:20.079 --> 01:17:23.679
<v Brent>terminal emulator, Ghost TTY and Neary desktop.

01:17:24.379 --> 01:17:28.339
<v Brent>It's been rock solid. And by the way, the boost amount is cryptic,

01:17:28.519 --> 01:17:30.019
<v Brent>but related to Bcache FS.

01:17:30.879 --> 01:17:36.919
<v Chris>Oh, interesting. 6, 7, 7, 100. Oh, Maybe a commit number?

01:17:38.219 --> 01:17:42.279
<v Wes>I think my prediction should have been something about how much of the audience is running Bcache.

01:17:42.399 --> 01:17:42.699
<v Chris>Really?

01:17:43.019 --> 01:17:43.079
<v Brent>Yeah.

01:17:44.239 --> 01:17:48.419
<v Chris>I love to hear how it goes. Keep us posted on that, too. And CacheOS Kernel,

01:17:48.459 --> 01:17:50.999
<v Chris>I agree, is pretty great, even on NixOS.

01:17:51.299 --> 01:17:53.859
<v Chris>So good to hear. Thank you for that.

01:17:54.479 --> 01:17:58.119
<v Chris>Thor's coming in with a row of ducks. That's 2,222 sats.

01:17:59.449 --> 01:18:03.029
<v Chris>And he says he loved the People's File System episode. Now I really need to

01:18:03.029 --> 01:18:07.349
<v Chris>try out Bcache FS. I have an upcoming reinstall for sure.

01:18:08.249 --> 01:18:11.929
<v Chris>Yeah. I do that thing, too. Like, I'm thinking about my next install,

01:18:11.969 --> 01:18:14.709
<v Chris>and I'm like, okay, this time around, I'm going to do Bcache FS.

01:18:14.729 --> 01:18:16.589
<v Chris>I'm going to do a two-gigabyte boot.

01:18:16.849 --> 01:18:17.829
<v Wes>New install dreams.

01:18:18.009 --> 01:18:18.349
<v Chris>Yes.

01:18:18.589 --> 01:18:18.689
<v Wes>Yes.

01:18:19.469 --> 01:18:22.249
<v Chris>Even when the system's totally fine, I already start planning the next system.

01:18:22.349 --> 01:18:23.749
<v Wes>You got to think about something while you're falling asleep.

01:18:23.929 --> 01:18:26.529
<v Chris>That's true. Thank you, Thor. Appreciate that. Boost.

01:18:27.929 --> 01:18:31.649
<v Wes>Adagia boosts in with 6,969 sets.

01:18:32.089 --> 01:18:32.569
<v Brent>Cryptic.

01:18:35.089 --> 01:18:41.089
<v Wes>Love the chat with Kent as well as the one with Carl today. Our pal Carl from System76 of course.

01:18:41.269 --> 01:18:42.249
<v Chris>Yeah, and the new Cosmic release.

01:18:42.569 --> 01:18:46.509
<v Wes>The technical episodes are some of my favorite, but then I often find myself

01:18:46.509 --> 01:18:49.689
<v Wes>not knowing what to say, kind of addressing boosting or not.

01:18:49.869 --> 01:18:53.069
<v Wes>I also need to remind myself that when small boosts still give you signal even

01:18:53.069 --> 01:18:56.289
<v Wes>though I can't afford much beyond the party membership, and we really appreciate

01:18:56.289 --> 01:18:59.829
<v Wes>the boost amount I mean a huge amount of the value is just the message.

01:19:00.349 --> 01:19:01.869
<v Chris>Yeah and thank you for being a party member.

01:19:03.089 --> 01:19:08.429
<v Wes>Also Brent's comment reminded me have you guys read ADHD is awesome would 110%

01:19:08.429 --> 01:19:12.869
<v Wes>recommend wow got it on yeah and then there's some links and we can find some

01:19:12.869 --> 01:19:16.789
<v Wes>links maybe to it to add to the show notes thank you for the recommendation.

01:19:18.129 --> 01:19:20.049
<v Chris>ADHD I think the answer is no.

01:19:20.049 --> 01:19:20.909
<v Brent>This is a great.

01:19:20.909 --> 01:19:23.769
<v Chris>Recommendation I have not heard of that thank you yes I will look into that.

01:19:23.769 --> 01:19:26.629
<v Wes>Sounds like there should be an audio book available as well Oh.

01:19:26.689 --> 01:19:28.869
<v Chris>That's probably the route I'm going to go, you know, with ADD and all.

01:19:31.729 --> 01:19:32.969
<v Chris>I'll put a link to that in the show notes.

01:19:33.569 --> 01:19:34.309
<v Wes>Thank you, Daja.

01:19:34.689 --> 01:19:35.569
<v Chris>Thank you very much.

01:19:36.349 --> 01:19:41.849
<v Brent>Well, the Sithy Penguin boosted in. This is two boosts with rows of ducks.

01:19:45.443 --> 01:19:51.203
<v Brent>Hello there, JB Crew. I'm a medium-term listener question. What is the minimum

01:19:51.203 --> 01:19:53.083
<v Brent>time required for a long-time listener anyway?

01:19:53.963 --> 01:19:57.803
<v Brent>Either way, I've been listening for a few years now, and it's my first boost

01:19:57.803 --> 01:20:01.883
<v Brent>to any of the shows, but I did leave a voicemail on launch earlier this year.

01:20:02.683 --> 01:20:03.103
<v Wes>Nice.

01:20:03.423 --> 01:20:04.503
<v Chris>Well done. Thank you.

01:20:05.263 --> 01:20:06.323
<v Wes>A vocal boost.

01:20:06.323 --> 01:20:12.983
<v Brent>I am dropping my nix config for the next config confessions it's about 95 percent

01:20:12.983 --> 01:20:17.483
<v Brent>vibe coded with flakes and hyperland which i have yet to fully grasp but the

01:20:17.483 --> 01:20:19.143
<v Brent>next nerds room has been great.

01:20:19.143 --> 01:20:22.723
<v Wes>Oh good i'm glad to hear that it is a very helpful room.

01:20:22.723 --> 01:20:28.283
<v Brent>We didn't even open the next config confessions and we're already getting submissions this is great,

01:20:30.115 --> 01:20:34.195
<v Brent>Second Boost here says, hey, question for the crew. Do you ever collaborate

01:20:34.195 --> 01:20:37.675
<v Brent>with any of the other podcasters out there?

01:20:37.935 --> 01:20:40.895
<v Brent>Aside from all the stuff you guys have done since I tuned in,

01:20:41.535 --> 01:20:44.515
<v Brent>we'd love to see more collaborations with other Linux podcasts.

01:20:45.055 --> 01:20:48.815
<v Chris>That's a great – in fact, I meant to mention at the top of the show,

01:20:49.095 --> 01:20:53.355
<v Chris>Michael Tunnell from Tux Digital and Destination Linux was going to join us

01:20:53.355 --> 01:20:57.395
<v Chris>today for this episode but ended up with a sore throat and was traveling,

01:20:57.395 --> 01:20:59.175
<v Chris>so the two combined just couldn't make it work.

01:20:59.695 --> 01:21:05.075
<v Chris>because we do want to do more of that, but the reality is all of us are super

01:21:05.075 --> 01:21:06.615
<v Chris>busy making the shows that we make.

01:21:06.915 --> 01:21:09.775
<v Wes>Yeah, the double calendar system.

01:21:09.935 --> 01:21:15.415
<v Chris>I mean, just trying to schedule this week's episode was a little tricky,

01:21:15.515 --> 01:21:17.975
<v Chris>right? And then also additionally, there's time zones.

01:21:18.095 --> 01:21:21.495
<v Chris>So some people are on opposite times and stuff like that.

01:21:21.775 --> 01:21:25.035
<v Chris>So that is a compounding issue. So you'll often find a lot of us are just very

01:21:25.035 --> 01:21:28.555
<v Chris>heads down. But around the holidays, we try to reach out a little bit.

01:21:29.275 --> 01:21:31.395
<v Wes>Hopefully we can do some more collabs in 2026.

01:21:31.535 --> 01:21:35.795
<v Chris>Yeah, absolutely. And as far as what makes a medium-term listener?

01:21:37.835 --> 01:21:42.395
<v Chris>Well, so it's tough to say because the show's been going for a while. So maybe a year?

01:21:43.735 --> 01:21:48.695
<v Wes>Or maybe we need like, you know, like there's sort of like geologic eras.

01:21:48.835 --> 01:21:49.875
<v Wes>Maybe we need that for the show.

01:21:50.135 --> 01:21:50.575
<v Brent>Like E-Pons.

01:21:50.575 --> 01:21:51.075
<v Wes>Different eras.

01:21:51.695 --> 01:21:54.475
<v Chris>That is often a thing, right? That is often the way people...

01:21:54.475 --> 01:21:56.495
<v Wes>As a reference point. I kind of joined in this, yeah.

01:21:56.495 --> 01:22:01.335
<v Brent>Were you here for LUP 600 or not, you know, the pre-600 or post-600?

01:22:01.775 --> 01:22:05.175
<v Chris>If you're here before 600, you're probably no longer medium term.

01:22:05.255 --> 01:22:09.795
<v Chris>And if you're here before 300, you're probably a long time. I don't know. You could cut that out.

01:22:09.795 --> 01:22:11.515
<v Wes>Going forward, pre-van and post-van.

01:22:11.735 --> 01:22:15.195
<v Chris>Yeah, yeah. The van era. Sure, sure, sure, sure.

01:22:15.715 --> 01:22:19.835
<v Chris>That's great. All right. Thank you very much. Thank you for setting up the booze

01:22:19.835 --> 01:22:20.815
<v Chris>stuff, too, and setting that in.

01:22:20.915 --> 01:22:23.595
<v Chris>Really appreciate it. I know that takes a bit of work. And the beginning of

01:22:23.595 --> 01:22:25.035
<v Chris>the journey is the hardest guy.

01:22:25.655 --> 01:22:29.035
<v Chris>Thank you, Penguin Guy. Appreciate you. Hybrid sarcasm. There he is.

01:22:29.115 --> 01:22:30.695
<v Chris>Comes in with 10,000 sats.

01:22:33.252 --> 01:22:34.792
<v Chris>And he just says, Merry Christmas, boys.

01:22:35.452 --> 01:22:37.132
<v Wes>Oh, Merry Christmas to you too, Hybrid.

01:22:37.412 --> 01:22:38.792
<v Chris>Thank you, Hybrid. Merry Christmas.

01:22:39.432 --> 01:22:44.012
<v Wes>Pot Bun comes in with a row of ducks. It'd be interesting if we could somehow

01:22:44.012 --> 01:22:48.292
<v Wes>get a count of how many times you guys have said Graphene OS or Rust.

01:22:48.452 --> 01:22:48.672
<v Chris>Oh.

01:22:48.792 --> 01:22:50.332
<v Wes>I'm sure people would have other ideas.

01:22:51.432 --> 01:22:51.732
<v Chris>Yeah.

01:22:52.472 --> 01:22:53.912
<v Wes>I mean, we have transcripts now.

01:22:54.072 --> 01:22:57.432
<v Chris>That could be something that's done. And I would love if anybody ever wanted

01:22:57.432 --> 01:23:03.332
<v Chris>to cut together like a cut of our Rust coverage or our Graphene OS coverage.

01:23:03.332 --> 01:23:06.032
<v Chris>And we could do a highlight thing. And then one day we just, here you go.

01:23:06.192 --> 01:23:08.352
<v Chris>We're off for this week, Drew. Here's somebody made this for us.

01:23:08.592 --> 01:23:08.812
<v Drew>A supercut.

01:23:09.172 --> 01:23:11.032
<v Brent>Theme supercuts. I like that.

01:23:11.492 --> 01:23:15.512
<v Drew>Yeah, I thought you could write a Python script pretty easily that would go

01:23:15.512 --> 01:23:19.892
<v Drew>and search all the transcripts that we have available and give you a count.

01:23:20.712 --> 01:23:24.492
<v Brent>Drew, I'm going to say every time pod bun boosts in, I think ear buns.

01:23:24.492 --> 01:23:26.912
<v Brent>Not your buns, but your bunnies.

01:23:32.492 --> 01:23:38.832
<v Brent>Well, Odyssey Westra boosted in here at 20,000. Oh, sorry, 2,052 Satoshis.

01:23:40.212 --> 01:23:45.152
<v Brent>Sigh. It's just wet, cold, and windy on the east side of the state.

01:23:45.412 --> 01:23:46.552
<v Brent>That's Washington State.

01:23:47.192 --> 01:23:50.672
<v Brent>Winds didn't cause too much damage, though, on this side. Definitely not what

01:23:50.672 --> 01:23:54.652
<v Brent>you are all experiencing over there on the other side. That stays safe.

01:23:54.832 --> 01:23:59.232
<v Brent>Also, a little birthday boost since you released the episode on that same day.

01:23:59.752 --> 01:24:03.992
<v Chris>Oh. Happy birthday. Happy birthday. Yeah, the studio with the winds lost power

01:24:03.992 --> 01:24:09.292
<v Chris>twice, which really stinks because the UPS is last 15, 20 minutes,

01:24:09.452 --> 01:24:13.332
<v Chris>and the power was out for two hours one time, and then it was out for quite a while the second time.

01:24:14.052 --> 01:24:17.592
<v Chris>And it was one of those things where both times I wasn't here, so I showed up.

01:24:17.892 --> 01:24:21.512
<v Chris>And you start putting it together like, uh-oh, that's not right.

01:24:21.592 --> 01:24:23.372
<v Chris>That's not right. Oh, no.

01:24:23.992 --> 01:24:27.152
<v Chris>So there's always a bit of a job there. I'm glad you're okay over there, Odyssey.

01:24:28.092 --> 01:24:32.692
<v Chris>Mr. Mayhem's here with 2,323 sats.

01:24:34.503 --> 01:24:38.043
<v Chris>A new challenge suggestion. Oh, good. I was hoping we'd get one of these.

01:24:38.623 --> 01:24:43.303
<v Chris>He says, I just found out that damn small Linux has started showing signs of

01:24:43.303 --> 01:24:46.063
<v Chris>little life after 15 years of a hiatus.

01:24:46.443 --> 01:24:50.123
<v Chris>At least they were in 2024. A new challenge that I'd like to see is to find

01:24:50.123 --> 01:24:53.763
<v Chris>out how long the crew could last on damn small Linux while running the kind

01:24:53.763 --> 01:24:55.343
<v Chris>of hardware that DSL is made for.

01:24:55.703 --> 01:24:59.523
<v Chris>Is it the same as 30-bit challenge? Kind of. But it goes farther and embraces

01:24:59.523 --> 01:25:03.723
<v Chris>the ability to use modern software so long as it's small.

01:25:05.563 --> 01:25:09.303
<v Brent>This to me sounds like a vote for like co-host suffering.

01:25:10.003 --> 01:25:15.383
<v Chris>Yeah. I, I do think 2026 is prime for a new challenge. I, that's one of the

01:25:15.383 --> 01:25:16.583
<v Chris>things I enjoyed over 2025.

01:25:17.243 --> 01:25:21.263
<v Chris>I liked the home labs too. That was a lot of fun. We had some great challenges

01:25:21.263 --> 01:25:24.523
<v Chris>that really did push us. So like, how do you do more than that?

01:25:25.123 --> 01:25:28.503
<v Chris>I keep thinking, I just don't know how it comes down. I keep thinking we need

01:25:28.503 --> 01:25:32.183
<v Chris>to go out into the real world and get ourselves into a real situation with real

01:25:32.183 --> 01:25:34.483
<v Chris>time constraints and fix and solve something.

01:25:35.448 --> 01:25:37.148
<v Chris>And I think that would be a great challenge.

01:25:37.348 --> 01:25:38.068
<v Wes>I like this idea.

01:25:38.248 --> 01:25:41.608
<v Chris>Three days to like refurb somebody's home lab or three days to get a business

01:25:41.608 --> 01:25:44.568
<v Chris>network operational and, you know, that kind of thing.

01:25:44.788 --> 01:25:45.848
<v Brent>Can we bring epoxy?

01:25:46.688 --> 01:25:48.608
<v Chris>Yeah. We're going to need a lot of epoxy.

01:25:48.788 --> 01:25:48.908
<v Wes>Buddy.

01:25:49.348 --> 01:25:52.148
<v Chris>We're going to need a lot of epoxy. All right.

01:25:52.288 --> 01:25:55.328
<v Chris>So, like I said, if you did not hear your boost read, don't worry.

01:25:55.328 --> 01:25:58.628
<v Chris>We have it. We're saving it for next week's episode just with the recording schedule.

01:25:58.908 --> 01:26:02.968
<v Chris>We do appreciate you sending that in and we will read them next week.

01:26:02.968 --> 01:26:05.468
<v Chris>So here's what we have for this episode so far.

01:26:05.668 --> 01:26:08.648
<v Chris>And first I want to start by thanking those of you who stream SATs.

01:26:08.908 --> 01:26:14.688
<v Chris>As you listened, we had a really, well, that's pretty good. 27 is pretty good

01:26:14.688 --> 01:26:16.248
<v Chris>for total streamers because I was looking at the total streams.

01:26:16.408 --> 01:26:21.388
<v Chris>It was 2,183 total streams. And the SAT stackers streaming it right in here.

01:26:21.508 --> 01:26:26.868
<v Chris>92,359 stacked by you streamers. Thank you very much. That's a very nice, healthy number.

01:26:27.148 --> 01:26:30.208
<v Chris>But get ready for this. When you combine it with our boosters this week,

01:26:30.268 --> 01:26:32.848
<v Chris>we are rounding 2025 out really strong.

01:26:32.968 --> 01:26:44.028
<v Chris>This episode got tremendous support with a total stats of 1,952,729 Satoshis.

01:26:44.168 --> 01:26:44.508
<v Drew>Whoa.

01:26:45.368 --> 01:26:45.728
<v Chris>Unbelievable.

01:26:46.188 --> 01:26:46.388
<v Wes>Woo.

01:27:04.820 --> 01:27:08.180
<v Chris>Thank you, everyone who supports the show with a membership or with a boost.

01:27:08.280 --> 01:27:11.640
<v Chris>Fountain FM is making that easier and easier, but there's an entire self-hosted

01:27:11.640 --> 01:27:14.180
<v Chris>infrastructure with Albie and lots of great apps.

01:27:14.320 --> 01:27:18.000
<v Chris>You get not just boosts, but new features, transcripts, pod chapters,

01:27:18.220 --> 01:27:21.340
<v Chris>all kinds of stuff like new release announcements, all that right there in the

01:27:21.340 --> 01:27:24.540
<v Chris>app, including live streams. Thank you, everybody who supports the show.

01:27:24.900 --> 01:27:29.320
<v Chris>It really means a lot to us. you know, I, at times, right, as a small business

01:27:29.320 --> 01:27:32.640
<v Chris>owner, the thing that really stresses me out, if you'll allow the cliche,

01:27:32.780 --> 01:27:36.160
<v Chris>the thing that keeps me up at night is often how am I going to fund the next quarter?

01:27:36.900 --> 01:27:40.640
<v Chris>At the end of the year with the holidays, all of it so much is up in the air,

01:27:41.400 --> 01:27:44.780
<v Chris>that if I was prone to, you know, ulcers, I'd probably have a real,

01:27:44.780 --> 01:27:46.740
<v Chris>a real zinger right now. Thankfully I am not.

01:27:47.100 --> 01:27:52.700
<v Chris>But when we get support like that, you know, I know this sounds trite and cliche, but it is true.

01:27:52.780 --> 01:27:56.080
<v Chris>I am going to sleep better at night knowing that we have that now in the bank.

01:27:56.360 --> 01:28:00.180
<v Chris>And even if I don't get contracts signed, you know, we're going to survive for

01:28:00.180 --> 01:28:02.400
<v Chris>a little bit longer with the members and with the boost.

01:28:02.440 --> 01:28:05.000
<v Chris>It truly makes a bigger difference than you can appreciate.

01:28:05.240 --> 01:28:08.320
<v Chris>Thank you everyone for supporting the show. It means a lot.

01:28:09.857 --> 01:28:15.337
<v Chris>And with that, it's time for a few banger picks. We couldn't help ourselves once again.

01:28:15.857 --> 01:28:19.717
<v Chris>And the first one is for those of you that are still living the TUI lifestyle

01:28:19.717 --> 01:28:20.817
<v Chris>after our TUI challenge.

01:28:20.917 --> 01:28:21.617
<v Wes>Which I hope is everyone.

01:28:22.257 --> 01:28:26.977
<v Chris>And it's, I don't know, how would you say this one, Wes? Emildung?

01:28:28.257 --> 01:28:31.557
<v Wes>Actually, that was better than I thought you were going to do. Yeah, I think ship it.

01:28:32.557 --> 01:28:33.877
<v Chris>Emildung is a...

01:28:34.677 --> 01:28:35.537
<v Wes>Elmildung? I don't know.

01:28:35.617 --> 01:28:39.777
<v Chris>Yeah, I'm sure I'm getting that wrong. It's a TUI RSS reader based on the Awesome

01:28:39.777 --> 01:28:42.557
<v Chris>News Flash library, mostly written in Rust.

01:28:43.997 --> 01:28:46.437
<v Wes>And with a flaked Nix in its repo.

01:28:46.637 --> 01:28:52.337
<v Chris>It does indeed. It's also beautiful. It's strange to say about a TUI,

01:28:52.437 --> 01:28:57.477
<v Chris>again, terminal user interface RSS reader, but it is actually very beautiful.

01:28:57.677 --> 01:29:03.617
<v Chris>And I think nicer design than just about every GUI RSS reader app I've ever used.

01:29:04.117 --> 01:29:07.257
<v Chris>And it could be just a really great way to bust through some RSS.

01:29:07.557 --> 01:29:11.557
<v Chris>And also, I'd love to know if there's interest. I have recently set up my own

01:29:11.557 --> 01:29:16.177
<v Chris>fresh RSS instance with a few integrations, summary tools, and different plugins.

01:29:16.397 --> 01:29:20.857
<v Chris>If you're out there and would like me to do a segment on fresh RSS, let me know.

01:29:21.277 --> 01:29:25.557
<v Chris>Send us an email at linuxunplugged.com slash contact, or even better, send us a boost.

01:29:26.357 --> 01:29:31.617
<v Chris>Because I have, I think, been very surprised with my time with fresh RSS.

01:29:31.857 --> 01:29:31.977
<v Wes>Ooh.

01:29:32.777 --> 01:29:37.177
<v Chris>Now, this next pick I put in here because I really wanted to get your take.

01:29:37.457 --> 01:29:40.117
<v Chris>You could educate me on this because there's a few things I don't know about.

01:29:40.417 --> 01:29:43.437
<v Chris>And the pick is, it's an app. It's called ZeeBridge.

01:29:43.937 --> 01:29:48.757
<v Chris>And it's a contract bridge game, which I guess is a...

01:29:50.400 --> 01:29:53.880
<v Chris>taking card game for four players i don't really understand but it's the.

01:29:53.880 --> 01:29:54.740
<v Wes>Game of bridge.

01:29:54.740 --> 01:29:57.860
<v Chris>Contract bridge yeah based okay based on bridge and z

01:29:57.860 --> 01:30:00.600
<v Chris>bridge is an online bridge club where you

01:30:00.600 --> 01:30:03.320
<v Chris>can play in learning mode you can play with other

01:30:03.320 --> 01:30:06.300
<v Chris>people in multiplayer you can play against a quote-unquote game

01:30:06.300 --> 01:30:12.100
<v Chris>ai you're jethro is that what it's called play with jethro that's a competitive

01:30:12.100 --> 01:30:19.460
<v Chris>bridge bot so jethro is available but uh i know nothing about bridge and uh

01:30:19.460 --> 01:30:22.800
<v Chris>you on the other hand know quite a bit about bridge so i'm wondering if this

01:30:22.800 --> 01:30:25.420
<v Chris>passes the westpain sniff test the z bridge app.

01:30:25.420 --> 01:30:31.300
<v Wes>Yeah it does look like it is a flat pack of an electron packaging for the service.

01:30:31.300 --> 01:30:33.960
<v Chris>Yes it's it is there's they have a website but that makes.

01:30:33.960 --> 01:30:35.080
<v Wes>It pretty easy to get going.

01:30:35.080 --> 01:30:35.820
<v Chris>Yeah and.

01:30:35.820 --> 01:30:41.380
<v Wes>Uh i like the idea that you are learning bridge so i'm gonna say a thumbs up.

01:30:41.380 --> 01:30:44.300
<v Chris>All right i got the thumbs up all right i like that.

01:30:44.300 --> 01:30:49.380
<v Brent>When i read the title z bridge i thought it was like a zigbee bridge for home

01:30:49.380 --> 01:30:54.260
<v Brent>assistant or something and then the description much better threw me right off did not expect that.

01:30:54.260 --> 01:30:57.560
<v Chris>Also no license was found for that one.

01:30:58.639 --> 01:31:01.939
<v Drew>I've got a quick pick for you guys if you want a third one.

01:31:02.399 --> 01:31:03.359
<v Chris>Yes, we do.

01:31:03.699 --> 01:31:07.419
<v Drew>All right. Yeah, I always like bringing you guys some audio visualization fun.

01:31:07.999 --> 01:31:08.479
<v Brent>Yes.

01:31:08.639 --> 01:31:14.119
<v Drew>This one's called Cavalier. It is based on the Cava graphics engine.

01:31:14.279 --> 01:31:14.499
<v Wes>Sure.

01:31:14.759 --> 01:31:17.499
<v Drew>And it's also written in .NET 8.

01:31:17.719 --> 01:31:18.939
<v Chris>Oh, this looks really nice.

01:31:19.019 --> 01:31:23.919
<v Drew>And it's MIT licensed. But, yeah, it's just a little visualizer.

01:31:24.139 --> 01:31:27.819
<v Drew>You just connect it and Pipewire does the rest.

01:31:27.819 --> 01:31:34.799
<v Drew>It will automatically connect to your main out monitors, or you can manually

01:31:34.799 --> 01:31:41.159
<v Drew>connect it to something else through Helvum or QPW Graph, whatever your choice is.

01:31:41.299 --> 01:31:44.999
<v Drew>And it has a lot of little options that you can make it your own.

01:31:45.099 --> 01:31:48.659
<v Drew>It's really cool, small, fancy, and fun.

01:31:48.939 --> 01:31:53.319
<v Chris>Take the best part of Winamp and make it into this app is what they've done.

01:31:53.319 --> 01:31:56.939
<v Chris>The visualizer with customization options where you can have in a window.

01:31:57.579 --> 01:32:01.739
<v Chris>It's really cool looking, too. It's a nice, modern Linux desktop app.

01:32:02.219 --> 01:32:02.439
<v Wes>Rad.

01:32:02.999 --> 01:32:07.859
<v Chris>Yeah. All right. That's a good pick. And so it's Cavalier, and we'll put a link to that.

01:32:08.059 --> 01:32:08.779
<v Wes>MIT license?

01:32:08.879 --> 01:32:14.079
<v Drew>Yep. Available as a Flatpak or Snap. Looks like they have it in Arch as well.

01:32:14.859 --> 01:32:18.119
<v Chris>Very nice. Drew, thank you for joining us and playing referee.

01:32:18.119 --> 01:32:20.159
<v Chris>It's always good to see you and catch up.

01:32:20.419 --> 01:32:22.919
<v Drew>You're very welcome. It was my pleasure and my honor.

01:32:24.019 --> 01:32:27.659
<v Chris>And I think we got some good results. I think you got good results out of us.

01:32:27.759 --> 01:32:28.919
<v Chris>So that's always appreciated.

01:32:29.179 --> 01:32:30.699
<v Wes>So we have someone to blame for next year.

01:32:30.999 --> 01:32:35.839
<v Chris>Yeah, right? Yeah. Even when Drew is not here, of course, the friendly hand

01:32:35.839 --> 01:32:37.499
<v Chris>of editor Drew touches every episode.

01:32:37.799 --> 01:32:40.559
<v Chris>So thank you, Drew. Round of applause for all your hard work there.

01:32:40.899 --> 01:32:41.599
<v Drew>Thank you. Thank you.

01:32:42.939 --> 01:32:49.699
<v Chris>Now, we encourage you to make it a Tuesday on a Sunday and join us live Sunday, 10 a.m. Pacific, 1 p.m.

01:32:49.979 --> 01:32:52.559
<v Chris>Eastern over at jblive.tv.

01:32:56.069 --> 01:32:59.689
<v Chris>And if they're getting us on the download, depending on their podcast client,

01:32:59.909 --> 01:33:02.749
<v Chris>Wes, there's some fancy features they can take advantage of.

01:33:02.869 --> 01:33:06.869
<v Wes>Yeah, how do you feel about a magical cloud-based JSON that comes right to you

01:33:06.869 --> 01:33:09.309
<v Wes>and tells you where we talk about what?

01:33:09.449 --> 01:33:12.809
<v Chris>And you know what I like about that? We can update it dynamically when we make a mistake.

01:33:12.949 --> 01:33:15.909
<v Wes>Yeah, it's got like you can put in images and all kinds of fancy features,

01:33:16.009 --> 01:33:18.369
<v Wes>which we don't even fully take advantage of yet, but we will.

01:33:18.529 --> 01:33:19.969
<v Chris>One day, the more people use it.

01:33:20.389 --> 01:33:24.469
<v Wes>And you can also just get a whole transcript. Maybe you want to count words

01:33:24.469 --> 01:33:25.709
<v Wes>that we say way too often?

01:33:25.709 --> 01:33:26.309
<v Chris>Maybe you do.

01:33:26.569 --> 01:33:29.469
<v Wes>Yeah. Well, that could be one way to look at it. Or if you just want to be able

01:33:29.469 --> 01:33:32.769
<v Wes>to follow along or double check something we said, or I mean,

01:33:32.829 --> 01:33:33.569
<v Wes>it's just nice to be able to read.

01:33:33.709 --> 01:33:35.589
<v Chris>It's all right there if you just need to double check something or whatever

01:33:35.589 --> 01:33:39.489
<v Chris>it is. And also makes it more accessible as well, which is a big thing.

01:33:39.889 --> 01:33:43.369
<v Chris>And links to what we talked about today. Those, my friends, are linked over

01:33:43.369 --> 01:33:46.909
<v Chris>at linuxunplugged.com slash 647.

01:33:47.949 --> 01:33:49.949
<v Chris>Sometimes these holiday episodes a little lighter on the links,

01:33:50.029 --> 01:33:51.749
<v Chris>but we tend to have pretty copious show notes.

01:33:51.889 --> 01:33:54.949
<v Chris>So it's always worth checking out. There's usually more in there. but links

01:33:54.949 --> 01:33:58.249
<v Chris>to like the apps we talked about and whatnot some of the news that i'll

01:33:58.249 --> 01:34:01.369
<v Chris>be in the show notes at linuxunplugged.com slash 647

01:34:01.369 --> 01:34:04.129
<v Chris>you'll also find our rss feed our mumble room info

01:34:04.129 --> 01:34:09.049
<v Chris>our matrix info membership info boost info all of it it's a website with links

01:34:09.049 --> 01:34:13.029
<v Chris>at linuxunplugged.com and then you can go check out the launch recent episode

01:34:13.029 --> 01:34:17.769
<v Chris>had brent in it or this week in bitcoin all of that and more over at jupiterbroadcasting.com

01:34:17.769 --> 01:34:21.629
<v Chris>thanks so much for joining us on this week's episode of Your Unplugged Program,

01:34:21.749 --> 01:34:26.269
<v Chris>and we'll see you right back here next Tuesday, as in Sunday!

